Himachal Pradesh

Una

42/2016(H)

Nishant Garg - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manish Thakur - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Bajinder Sharma

11 Apr 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM UNA
DISTRICT UNA (HP).
 
Complaint Case No. 42/2016(H)
 
1. Nishant Garg
S/o. Sh. R.S. Garg, R/o. Village Balh Dodan, PO. Dudhana, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (HP), Presently Residing at House No. 348, Ward No.1, Near Degree College, Anoo, Hamirpur (HP) 177001
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Manish Thakur
S/o. Sh. Ashok Kumar, R/o. Village Gundwin, PO. Dudhana, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (HP), Present C/o. Fashion Hut, Patta Road, Tarkwari, District Hamirpur (HP) 177001
2. Kritika Rana
W/o. Sh. Manish Thakur, R/o. Village Gundwin, PO. Dudhana, Tehsil & District Hamirpur (HP), Present C/o. Fashion Hut, Patta Road, Tarkwari, District Hamirpur (HP) 177001
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Davinder kumar PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sushma Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
Shri Bharat Chaudhary, vice counsel for complainant.
 
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

Consideration on admission of complaint made.

Complainant approached this Forum for redressal of his grievance with the averments that he is Lawyer by profession and he had been engaged by the opposite parties for solemnizing their marriage and preparing marriage documents and a fee of Rupees 15,000/- was agreed to be paid to the complainant by the opposite parties. The opposite parties did not pay the fee to the complainant, hence present complaint.

But, this Forum finds no relationship of Consumer and Service Provider between the parties the present complaint, because at the time of execution of agreement for getting solemnized the marriage of opposite parties, it was the opposite parties who had hired the services of the complainant and became Consumer, whereas, the complainant had paid his services being Lawyer to the opposite parties and became Service Provider. Therefore, by way of this the complainant does not fall within the definition of Consumer as defined under the Act. Hence, the complaint in hand is not maintainable before this Forum and the same is dismissed. The file after registration and needful be consigned to the Record Room.

Announced

11-04-2016

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Davinder kumar]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sushma Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.