NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2492/2008

TATA MOTORS LIMITED - Complainant(s)

Versus

MANISH KUMAR & ANR - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO

19 Mar 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2036 OF 2008
 
(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission Rajasthan)
1. M/S. KAMAL & CO.
a
a
a
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. MANISH KUMAR & ANR.
a
a
a
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 2492 OF 2008
 
(Against the Order dated 30/01/2006 in Appeal No. 407/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)
1. TATA MOTORS LIMITED
8th Floor, Centre No.1 World Trade Centre, Cuffe Prade
Mumbai - 400 005
Maharashtra
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. MANISH KUMAR & ANR
Resident of 20/45, New Saganare Road, Mansarovar
Jaipur
Rajasthan
2. KAMAL & CO.
Sandeep Gehlot MIG Road
Jaipur
Rajasthan
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 3086 OF 2008
 
(Against the Order dated 19/02/2008 in Appeal No. 407/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)
1. MANISH KUMAR
Resident of 20/45, New Sanganer Road, Mansarovar
Jaipur
RAJASTHAN
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. KAMAL & CO. & ANR.
Through its Work Manager, Sandeep Gehlot, M.I. Road
Jaipur
RAJASTHAN
2. M/S. TATA MOTORS LTD.
Through its Authorised Singatory
Shri K.K. Tanti, M.I. Road Jaipur
RAJASTHAN
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. REKHA GUPTA, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv.
Mr. Aditya Narain, Advocate with
Ms. Suman Sundd and Mr.
Surabh Seth, Advocates
Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Adv
For the Respondent :
Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Adv. for
R-1
Mr. Aditya Narain, Advocate with
Ms. Suman Sundd and Mr.
Surabh Seth, Advocates for R-2
Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Adv. for
R-1
Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv. for R-2
Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv. for
M/s Kamal & Co. (R-1)
Mr. Aditya Narain, Advocate with
Ms. Suman Sundd and Mr.
Surabh Seth, Advocates for R-2

Dated : 19 Mar 2014
ORDER

The above revision petitions arise out of common order dated 19.02.2008, passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan, in (First Appeal No. 407 of 2006) Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Advocate for Original Complainant-Manish Kumar states, that the complainant does not want to pursue (R.P. No.3086 of 2008) filed by him. Therefore, complaint filed by the complainant be dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty may be granted to the Complainant to seek appropriate relief before the appropriate forum. In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the complainant, Revision Petition No.3086 of 2008, stand dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the complaint filed before the District Forum, stand dismissed as withdrawn. The Revision Petitions (No.2492 and 2036 of 2008) filed by the Opposite Parties/ Petitioners stand allowed. Liberty as sought for is granted to the complainant in (RP No. 3086 of 2008) to seek appropriate relief before the appropriate forum. Above noted revision petitions stand disposed of accordingly. Dasti to all parties.

 
......................J
V.B. GUPTA
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
REKHA GUPTA
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.