Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/108/2022

Thomas Kochenayil - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manipal cigma health insurance - Opp.Party(s)

22 Aug 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

       SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN   : PRESIDENT

     SMT.PREETHA G NAIR: MEMBER

                                       SRI.VIJU.V.R              : MEMBER

CC.NO.108/22 (Filed on : 21/03/2022)

ORDER DATED : 22/08/2022

COMPLAINANT

Thomas Kochenavyil,

S/o.K.M.Thomas,

Advocate, Residing at “Kochenavyil,”

Sreekanteswaram,

Thiruvananthapuram – 23

Having office at Kochenavyil Chambers,

2^nd Floor, GKN Towers, Vanchiyoor,

Thiruvananthapuram – 35

(Party in person)

VS

 

OPPOSITE PARTIES

1. M/s.Manipal Cigna Health Insurance Company Ltd,

401/402, Raheja Titanium, Western Express Highway,

Goregaon (East), Mumbai – 400063,

Rep.by its Managing Director

2. M/s.Manipal Cigna Health Insurance Company Ltd, 1^st Floor,

Mathewsons Centre Point, Above Kotak Mahendra Bank,

Mamangalam, Kochi, Kerala – 682025

Rep.by its Principal Officer / Authorized Signatory

3. The Manager, Media Assist India TPA Pvt LTd, IBC Knowledge Park,

4.  

4. The Principal Officer, Hero Insurance Booking India Pvt Ltd, Phase 3,

Okhala Industrial Estate, New Delhi

(OPS 1 & 2 by Adv.Saji Isaac.K.J)

(OP4 by Adv.Prasanna kumar Nair)

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN        : PRESIDENT

1.           This complaint is filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2.         This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite parties. The opposite parties 1 & 2 represented and filed vakalath. As the notice issued to the opposite parties 3 & 4 returned unserved, complainant taken steps against OP3 and 5and 4^th opposite party entered appearance and notice issued to third opposite party was awaited. When the case came up for consideration today, the complainant and opposite parties represented and the complainant filed a memo stating that the matter is settled and he is not willing to further proceed with this complaint. The memo filed by the complainant is accepted and recorded. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the proceedings, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled.

          In the result, the complaint is dismissed as settled. There will be no order as to costs.

           A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

 

                 Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 22^nd   day of August 2022.

 

•  

P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

                                                                                            Sd/-

PREETHA G NAIR: MEMBER

                                                                                          Sd/-       

                                            VIJU.V.R     : MEMBER

 

 

Be/