Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/222/2018

M/s. Capital Honda Aadit Auto Company Ltd , Rep by its Managing Director, Meenambakkam, Chennai-2 and another - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manimegalai Poonjolai W/o Simathari, Saligramam, Chennai-600 093 and another - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. Malar Vizhi Udayakumar

28 Nov 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

 

F.A. No.222/2018

 

(Against the Order dt.25.07.2017 made in C.C. No.95/2010 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chengalpattu)

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023

 

 

1. M/s. Capital Honda Aadit Auto

Company Pvt. Ltd.,

Represented by its Managing Director,

No.18, GST Road,

Meenambakkam,

Chennai – 600 027.

 

2. The Managing Director,

M/s. Capital Honda Aadit Auto

Company Pvt. Ltd.,

No.18, GST Road,

Meenambakkam,

Chennai – 600 027.                                            .. Appellants / Opposite parties 1 & 2.

 

-Versus-

1. Manimegalai Poonjolai,

W/o. Mr. Simathari,

Block – 1, A 5, Siddarth Heights,

No.55, Arcot Road,

Saligramam,

Chennai  - 600 093.                                                   ..  1^st Respondent / Complainant.

 

2. M/s. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.,

Represented by its Branch Manager,

NTG Complex, B1 No.14,

Ramasamy Street,

West Tambaram,

Chennai – 600 045.                                           .. 2^nd Respondent / 3^rd Opposite party.

 

Counsel for Appellants / Opposite parties 1 & 2     : M/s. Malarvizhi Udayakumar

Counsel for 1^st Respondent  / Complainant            : M/s. P.L. Narayanan

2^nd Respondent  /  3^rd Opposite party                     : Notice dispensed with

                This appeal coming up before me on 28.11.2023 for appearance of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                                                 

                                                           

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for both parties.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed it over and called again at 12.30 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.   Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default.    No costs.

 

               

                                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                        

                                                                                                               PRESIDENT