Delhi

West Delhi

CC/16/407

SAGAR SIKDAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

MANGLA TELECOM - Opp.Party(s)

15 May 2017

ORDER

407/16                   D.O.O- 15.05.2017

Present :-          None for complainant.

                    Counsel for OP-2

                    OPs- 1 and 3 exparte.    

                    Complaint passed over several times since morning. But none put in appearance on behalf of complainant. It is already 02.40 P.M. There is none on behalf of complainant to file rejoinder and evidence and also pay conditional cost of Rs.1,000/-(One thousand rupees only). No further wait is justified and possible. It seems that Complainant is not interested in prosecution of Complaint.  

Therefore, this forum has no option except to dismiss the Complaint in default for non-prosecution. Hence the Complaint is dismissed in default for non prosecution.

Copy of order be sent to the parties as per rules. File be consigned.   

 

                       

(PUNEET LAMBA)                                                              ( R.S.  BAGRI )

                              MEMBER                                                               PRESIDENT

                                   15.05.2017                                                                                                   15.05.2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.