Maharashtra

StateCommission

RP/10/70

M/S LAXMI CONSTRUCTION & ORS - Complainant(s)

Versus

MANGESH BRAHME & ORS - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.Anand Patwardhan

09 Mar 2011

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
Revision Petition No. RP/10/68
(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/05/2010 in Case No. 91/2010 of District Mumbai(Suburban))
 
1. M/S LAXMI CONSTRUCTIONS & ORS
41 CHAMARIA NIWAS MAHANT ROAD VILE PARLE (E) MUMBAI 57
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SUDHA D MALLYA
FLAT NO 10B MEGHANA APT OFF DR R P ROAD MULUND (W) MUMBAI
...........Respondent(s)
Revision Petition No. RP/10/69
(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/05/2010 in Case No. 103/2010 of District Mumbai(Suburban))
 
1. M/S LAXMI CONSTRUCTIONS, & ORS
41 CHAMARIA NIWASMAHANT ROAD VILEPARLE (E) MUBAI 57
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT SUMITRA A JAIN & ORS
L B S MARG MULUND (W)MUMBAI
...........Respondent(s)
Revision Petition No. RP/10/70
(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/05/2010 in Case No. 93/2010 of District Mumbai(Suburban))
 
1. M/S LAXMI CONSTRUCTION & ORS
VILE PARLE (E) MUMBAI 57
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MANGESH BRAHME & ORS
MULUND WEST MUMBAI 82
...........Respondent(s)
Revision Petition No. RP/10/71
(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/05/2010 in Case No. 105/2010 of District Mumbai(Suburban))
 
1. M/S LAXMI CONSTRUCTIONS & ORS
VILE PARLE (E) MUMBAI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. JAGANNATH N NAIK
MULUND (W) MUMBAI
...........Respondent(s)
Revision Petition No. RP/10/72
(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/05/2010 in Case No. 92/2010 of District Mumbai(Suburban))
 
1. M/S LAXMI CONSTUCTION & ORS
VILE PARLE MUMBAI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. NARESH M PURABIA & ORS
MULUND (W) MUMBAI
...........Respondent(s)
Revision Petition No. RP/10/73
(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/05/2010 in Case No. 104/2010 of District Mumbai(Suburban))
 
1. M/S LAXMI CONSTRUCTIONS & ORS
VILE PARLE (E) MUMBAI
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. DILIP S DHUMAK
MULUND (W) MUMBAI
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase PRESIDENT
 Hon'ble Mrs. J.D.Yengal MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr.Anand Patwardhan, Advocate for the Petitioner 1
 Mr.U.B. Wavikar, Advocate for the Respondent 1
ORDER

ORDER

(9th March, 2011)

Mr.Patwardhan –Advocate files an application that these group matters have been settled between the parties and even the complaints are withdrawn and, therefore, he submits that nothing survives in these revision petitions and, therefore, he may be allowed to withdraw those revision petitions.  Ld.Counsel Mr.Wavikar for the respondents has no objection for withdrawal of those revision petitions.  In view of the application and the consensus given by both the parties Revision Petition nos.10/68 to 10/73 stands disposed of as withdrawn.  Application is marked as ‘Exhibit X’ for identification.

                                                ORDER

Revision Petition nos.10/68 to 10/73 stands disposed of as withdrawn. 

Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

 

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase]
PRESIDENT
 
[Hon'ble Mrs. J.D.Yengal]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.