Telangana

Nalgonda

CC/54/2014

Gurram Rami Reddy - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manger (Health), LIC of Inida - Opp.Party(s)

M.V.Ragava Rao

21 Mar 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM
NALGONDA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/54/2014
 
1. Gurram Rami Reddy
Mattampally (Vi & M),
Nalgonda
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Manger (Health), LIC of Inida
Jeevan Sagar , Divisional Office, Near NTR Stadium, Lower Tank Nund Road, Hyderabd
Hyderabad
2. Branch Manager, LIC of India
M.B.R.Complex, Huzrnagar Road, Kodad-508206
Nalgonda
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Smt.Prema Rajeswari PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.Vinodh Reddy Member
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 21 Mar 2016
Final Order / Judgement

    BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT NALGONDA

 

       PRESENT:  Smt.PREMA RAJESWARI,

                       FAC PRESIDENT.

                                                                               

 

                       SRI K.VINODH REDDY,

                       MEMBER.

 

. . .

 

MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH, 2016

 

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT No. 54 OF 2014

 

Between: 

 

     Gurram Rami Reddy S/o Sudhakar Reddy, Aged: 37 years,

     Occ: Private Employee, R/o Mattampally Village and Mandal,

     Nalgonda District.

 

                                                                                                         …Complainant.

 

                                        And

 

 

  1)Manager (Health), LIC of India, “Jeevan Sagar”, Divisional Office,

     Near: NTR Stadium, Lower Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad-500 080.

 

  2)Branch Manager, LIC of India, M.B.R.Complex, Huzurnagar Road,

     Kodad-508 206.

 

 

                                                                                                  …OPPOSITE PARTIES.

 

 

        This complaint  coming on before us for final hearing on this day, in the presence of Sri M.V.Raghava Rao, Advocate for the Complainant,   and Sri P.Srinivas Reddy, Advocate for the Opposite Parties, and  on perusing the material papers on record, the Forum passed the following:

 

 

ORDER

 

        The Complainant filed advancement petition and the same is allowed as per orders in I.A.No.07/2006.  The Complainant also filed a memo stating that he is not pressing the above case and requested to dismiss the complaint as not pressed.  Hence the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.

 

 

Written and corrected by me and pronounced by us in the open Forum  on this 21st day of March, 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBER                                                                FAC PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Smt.Prema Rajeswari]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.Vinodh Reddy]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.