Karnataka

Mandya

CC/10/36

Sri Kanigowdara Shivalingaiah. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mandya Auto Agencies, Bajaj Auto Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Inperson

10 Aug 2010

ORDER


DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYA
D.C.Office Compound, Opp. District Court Premises, Mandya - 571 401.
consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/36

Sri Kanigowdara Shivalingaiah.		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Mandya Auto Agencies, Bajaj Auto Ltd.,
Bajaj Auto Finance Ltd., 		...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N.Manohara

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

ORDER Case called out. A joint memo is filed stating that the matter has been settled between the parties. The key of the vehicle, original R.C.Book and NOC (Form 14 and 35) in duplicate are handed over by the advocate for the Opposite party to the Complainant who is present in person. The Complainant submits, the complaint may be disposed accordingly. In view of the memo and submission made, the complaint is disposed. There is no order as to costs.




......................Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma
......................Sri.M.N.Manohara