Mandeep Mobile Repair Centrer V/S Sh.Sukhdeep Singh - Consumer Court Case

Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/09/253

Sh.Sukhdeep Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mandeep Mobile Repair Centrer - Opp.Party(s)

Sh Lachman Kumar Advocate

17 Dec 2009

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/253

Sh.Sukhdeep Singh						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Mandeep Mobile Repair Centrer						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh. Rajdeep Goyal, Advocate, counsel for the opposite party No.3. W.O. Stated that opposite party No.3 is ready and willing to replace the new mobile handset with new fresh warranty to the complainant to avoid the litigation. Opposite party No.3 is ready to new bill of replaced set. RO & AC Member Member President, D.C..F., 17.12.09 Statement of Sh.Sukhdeep Singh son of Sh.Mohinder Singh Residsent of Vill.Kotfatta Distt.Bathinda on oath alongwith his counsel Sh.Lachhman Kumar W.O. Stated that I have received new mobile set Micromax with IMEI No.910001046586225 and 910001048586223 from opposite party No.3 and my claim has been satisfied. I may be allowed to withdraw the complaint. I shall deliver the battery,headphone ,charger and battery cover. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 17.12.09. 17.12.09 Present: Counsel for the complainant alongwith complainant in person. Counsel for opposite party No.1&3. Counsel for the opposite party No.3 and complainant have made the above statement,they bound their statements. In view of the above statements,this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned. Member Member President, D.C.F.

Statement of Sh. Rajdeep Goyal, Advocate, counsel for the opposite party No.3. W.O. Stated that opposite party No.3 is ready and willing to replace the new mobile handset with new fresh warranty to the complainant to avoid the litigation. Opposite party No.3 is ready to new bill of replaced set. RO & AC Member Member President, D.C..F., 17.12.09 Statement of Sh.Sukhdeep Singh son of Sh.Mohinder Singh Residsent of Vill.Kotfatta Distt.Bathinda on oath alongwith his counsel Sh.Lachhman Kumar W.O. Stated that I have received new mobile set Micromax with IMEI No.910001046586225 and 910001048586223 from opposite party No.3 and my claim has been satisfied. I may be allowed to withdraw the complaint. I shall deliver the battery,headphone ,charger and battery cover. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 17.12.09. 17.12.09 Present: Counsel for the complainant alongwith complainant in person. Counsel for opposite party No.1&3. Counsel for the opposite party No.3 and complainant have made the above statement,they bound their statements. In view of the above statements,this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned. Member Member President, D.C.F.