Kerala

Kollam

CC/325/2020

Rufina Raju, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Managing Partner,Thomas Daniel, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.P.SAJEEV BABU

27 Oct 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Civil Station ,
Kollam-691013.
Kerala.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/325/2020
( Date of Filing : 25 Nov 2020 )
 
1. Rufina Raju,
Koipurathu Kripa Sadanam,173.Thevalapuram B,Neduvathoor, Thevelapuram, Kollam-691507.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Managing Partner,Thomas Daniel,
Popular Traders,Regd.Office Popular Towers,Vakayar,Pathanamthitta-689698.
2. S.Peter,
Branch Manager Popular Traders, Kannanalloor,Residing at, Shalom, Eravipuram.P.O,Kollam-691011.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL  COMMISSION, KOLLAM

Dated this the  27th      Day of  October  2022

 

  Present: -  Sri. E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LL.M. President

         Smt.S.Sandhya Rani, Bsc, L.L.B,Member

                   Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A.LLB, Member

 

                                                CC.325/2020

Rufina Raju                                                                              :           Complainant

Koipurathu Kripa Sadanam

173-Thevalapuram B, Neduvathoor, Thevalapuram

Kollam-691507.

[By Adv.P.Sajeev Babu]

V/s

  1. Popular Traders                                                            :           Opposite parties

         Regd.Office,Popular Towers

        Vakayar, Pathanamthitta.

      (Incorporated under the Companies Act 2013)

      Represented by its Managing Partner

      Thomas Daniel.

  1. S.Peter

         Branch Manager

         Popular Traders,Kannanalloor

        Residing at,Shalom, Eravipuram P.O

         Kollam-691011.

FINAL    ORDER

Complainant absent.  Exparte evidence not adduced.  Counsel for the complainant submits that he is having no instruction from the complainant.  The documents produced along with complaint are only unattested photo copies of  6 F.D receipts which cannot be accepted in evidence.

In the circumstances we are of the view that there is absolutely no evidence.

In the result complaint stands dismissed.

          No costs

Dated this the  27th   day of   October  2022.

                                                                         E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim:Sd/-

S.Sandhya Rani:Sd/-

Stanly Harold:Sd/-

Forwarded/by Order

Senior Superintendent

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.