Kerala

Kollam

CC/211/2017

S.Mohanan Pillai,S/o.Sivasankarapillai, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Managing Partner, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.P.R.JAYACHANDRAN

04 May 2018

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station , Kollam.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/211/2017
( Date of Filing : 19 Oct 2017 )
 
1. S.Mohanan Pillai,S/o.Sivasankarapillai,
Valavil Veedu,Murunthalcherry,Perinad.P.O,Thrikkadavur Village,Kollam-691 601.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Managing Partner,
Mithra Cable,Kadavoor,Perinad.P.O,Kollam District-691 601.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. M.PRAVEENKUMAR MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 04 May 2018
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOLLAM

            Dated this the    4th  day of May 2018

 

Present: -    Sri. E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LL.M. President

        Sri. M.Praveen Kumar,Bsc, LL.B ,Member

                                                                       

 CC.No.211/2017

S.Mohanan Pillai                                        :         Complainant

S/o Sivasankara Pillai

Valavil Veedu, Murunthacherry, Perinad P.O

Thrikkadavur village, Kollam-691601

[By Adv.P.R.Jayachandran]

V/s

Managing Director                                               :         Opposite party

Mithra Cable, Kadavur, Perinad P.O

Kollam-691601

ORDER

E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , President

            This is a consumer complaint filed Under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act by one Mr. Mohanan Pillai against the opposite party seeking to reconnect Cable connection with set top box along with 1 year warranty or to refund the amount of Rs.2100/- with interest and also to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- for the deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party.

The averments in the complaint in short are as follows. 

The complainant on 13.08.16 has obtained Cable TV  connection along with set top box from the opposite party institution by paying Rs.2100/-.  The opposite party has given warranty for 1 year to the Set top box installed while giving cable TV connection .  But on 30.06.17 the working of the set top box has been ceased.  The complainant on the very next day itself intimated the fact to the opposite party by reaching at the office.  There up on the opposite party directed the complainant to bring the set top box.  Accordingly on 2.07.17  the  complainant  brought the set top box to the office of the opposite

2

party. By receiving that defective set top box, the opposite party made the complainant to believe that the set top box will be substituted and set right the cable connection.   But  the  opposite party has not done anything as  promised  even after the expiry of 1 month.Thereafter when the complainant approached the opposite party at his office,  he stated lame excuses stating that new  set top box has not arrived.  The opposite party is duty bound to verify the cable
TV connection and set top box occasionally and set right the defects.  But he has not visited the premises and not inspected the cable TV connection and set top box and therefore it has become defective.    According to the complainant the above act of the opposite party amounts to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice.  Apart from the financial loss the complainant has sustained mental agony as the complainant and his family members could not view the day today TV programmes and therefore the opposite party is liable to pay compensation to the complainant.  The complainant further prays to install cable TV connection with 1 year extended warrantee by replacing the old and defective set top box.  The complainant caused to send lawyer notice on 17.08.17.  The opposite party received the same.  But till date the opposite party has not set right the defects.  Hence the complaint.

Though notice was served on the opposite party he remains absent nor filed any version.  Hence  the opposite party set exparty.

Complainant filed affidavit by reiterating the averments in the complaint and also got marked Ext.P1 to P5 documents.  Heard the counsel for the complainant and perused the records.  The unchallenged averments in the affidavit coupled with Ext.P1 Membership card, Ext.P2 warranty paper for set top box and Ext.P3 to P5 copy of the lawyer notice ,  Postal  receipt  and  Postal

 

3

Acknowledgement Card would substantiate the case of the complainant.  Therefore the complainant is entitled to get the reliefs as prayed for.

In the result the complaint stands allowed in the following terms.

The opposite party is directed to reconnect the cable connection along with a new set top box granting 1 year extended warranty failing which the opposite party is directed to return Rs.2100/- along with 12% interest for the said amount from 13.08.2016 till the date of payment.
            The opposite party is also directed to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.10,000/- to the complainant with interest @12% per annum from the date of complaint.

If the opposite party fails to comply with the above directions within 30 days as ordered above the complainant is allowed to realise Rs.12,100/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from 13/08/2016  and Rs.3000/- as costs from the opposite party  personally and from the assets of Mithra Cable, Kadavoor.

Dictated to the  Confidential Assistant Smt.Deepa.S transcribed and typed by her corrected by me and pronounced in the  Open Forum on this the       4th  day of  May  2018.         

 

E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim:Sd/-

                                                                                    President

            M.Praveen Kumar:Sd/-

             Member

                                                                                    Forwarded/by Order

           Senior Superintendent

4

 

INDEX

Witnesses Examined for the Complainant:-Nil

Documents marked for the  complainant

Ext.P1                  :         Membership Card

Ext.P2                  :         User manual

Ext.P3                  :         Advocate Notice

Ext.P4                  :         Postal receipt

Ext.P5                  :         Acknowledgement Card

Witness examined for the opposite party:-Nil

 

E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim:Sd/-

                                                                                   President

           M.Praveen Kumar:Sd/-

            Member

                                                                                  Forwarded/by Order

                                                                                   Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. M.PRAVEENKUMAR]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.