Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/413/2023

P.P. MUHAMMED SALIH - Complainant(s)

Versus

MANAGING PARTNER, ZAUJ FOOT WARE - Opp.Party(s)

26 Oct 2023

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODE
 
Complaint Case No. CC/413/2023
( Date of Filing : 11 Sep 2023 )
 
1. P.P. MUHAMMED SALIH
POOLAPPOYIL HOUSE,P.O ELETTIL,KODUVALLY,KOZHIKODE-673572
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING PARTNER, ZAUJ FOOT WARE
7Q5W.758,MAVOOR ROAD,OPP. SOUBHAGYA APARTMENT,ARAYIDATHUPALAM,KOZHIKODE-673016
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE Member
 HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 26 Oct 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE

PRESENT: Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB          : PRESIDENT

Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) :  MEMBER

Sri.V. BALAKRISHNAN, M Tech, MBA, LL.B, FIE: MEMBER

Thursday the 26th day of October 2023

C.C.413/2023

Complainant

P.P. Muhammed Salih,

Poolappoyil House,

Elettil Post,

                  Koduvally,

Kozhikode -673572

Opposite Parties

     Managing Partner,

     Zauj Footwear,

     FQ5W, 758, Mavoor road,

 Opp. Soubhagya apartment,

 Arayidathupalam,

 Kozhikode - 673016

ORDER

By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN – PRESIDENT 

           This is a complaint filed under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 alleging that defective footwear was sold to the complainant and seeking refund of the purchase price along with compensation.

  2. The opposite party did not respond to the notice issued from this Commission and hence set ex-parte

   3. The points that arise for determination in this case are :

  1. Whether there was any deficiency of service or unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party?  
  2. Reliefs and costs.

 

  1. Point No.1 – The opposite party was set ex-parte. The case was posted for evidence of the complainant several times. But the complainant also remained absent and did not file affidavit or adduce any evidence.  The fact that the opposite party was set ex-parte does not automatically entitles the complainant to get the relief sought for. It is for the complainant to prove the allegations in the complaint.  But the allegations are not proved. The complainant remained continuously absent and it appears that he is not interested in pursuing the matter.   No deficiency of service or unfair trade practice is proved against the opposite party.
  2. Point No.2:  In view of the finding on the above point, the complainant is not entitled to get the relief sought for and the complaint is only to be dismissed. 

In the result, CC 413/2023 is dismissed.No order as to costs.

 

Pronounced in open Commission on this the 26th day of October 2023.

 

Date of Filing: 11/09/2023

                                                                  

                                Sd/-                                                   Sd/-                                                      Sd/-

                       PRESIDENT                                         MEMBER                                         MEMBER

 

APPENDIX

NIL

 

                                 Sd/-                                                     Sd/-                                                         Sd/-

                         PRESIDENT                                         MEMBER                                              MEMBER

 

 

 

True Copy,

                                     

                                                                                                                                                      Sd/-

                                                                                                                                          Assistant Registrar      

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE]
Member
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM)]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.