Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/14/767

ANNAKUTTY K.M. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MANAGING DIRECTOR,KERALA WATER AUTHORITY - Opp.Party(s)

TOM JOSEPH

25 Oct 2014

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/14/767
 
1. ANNAKUTTY K.M.
VADAKKEL HOUSE,PERUMBALLOOR P.O.MUVATTUPUZHA-686673
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MANAGING DIRECTOR,KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

ERNAKULAM (CAMPSITTING AT MUVATTUPUZHA).

Date of filing : 13/10/2014

Date of Order : 25/10/2014

Present :-

Shri. A. Rajesh, President.

Shri. Sheen Jose, Member.

Smt. V.K. Beena Kumari, Member.

 

C.C. No. 767/2014

Between

     

    Annakutty. K.M.,

    ::

    Complainant

    Vadakkel House,

    Perumbavoor. P.O.,

    Muvattupuzha - 686 673.

     

    (By Adv. Tom Joseph,

    Court Road,

    Muvattupuzha – 686 661.)

    And

     

    1. Managing Director, Kerala

    Water Authority,

    ::

    Opposite Parties

    Thiruvananthapuram – 1.

    2. The Assistant Executive

    Engineer, Kerala Water

    Authority, P.H. Sub-Division,

    Muvattupuzha – 686 661.

     

    (Authorized

    representative)

    O R D E R

     

    V.K. Beena Kumari, Member.

     

    1. This complaint is filed alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties in issuing the impugned additional bill for Rs. 7,477/- dated 21-05-2014. The opposite parties filed their version stating that they have issued the disputed bill after considering the actual consumption of water by the complainant.

     

    2. Heard the learned counsel for the complainant and authorised representative of the opposite parties. The authorized representative of the opposite parties submitted that they have issued the impugned bill calculating consumption of water for the period from 03-11-2011 to 31-03-2014. The learned counsel for the complainant submitted that the complainant is prepared to remit the amount after taking long average consumption of water by the complainant from 01-03-2007 the date of replacement of water meter to till date.

     

    3. The submission on the part of the learned counsel for the complainant appears to be genuine and sustainable in law. We therefore direct the opposite parties to issue a revised bill for the period from 03-11-2011 till date, after taking long average consumption of water from 02-03-2007 to till date. Ordered accordingly.

     

    4. In the result, we set aside the impugned bill dated 21-05-2014 for Rs. 7,477/- for the above purpose. The opposite parties shall adjust the remittances made by the complainant towards future bills. The opposite parties are directed to comply with the above directions within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

     

    Pronounced in the open Forum on this the 25th day of October 2014.

     

    Sd/- V.K. Beena Kumari, Member.

    Sd/- A. Rajesh, President.

    Sd/- Sheen Jose, Member.

     

    Forwarded/By Order,

     

     

     

     

    Senior Superintendent.

     

     
     
    [HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH]
    PRESIDENT
     
    [HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE]
    MEMBER
     
    [HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI]
    MEMBER

    Consumer Court Lawyer

    Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!
    5.0 (615)

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!

    Experties

    Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

    Phone Number

    7982270319

    Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.