Kerala

Kollam

CC/78/2022

Neeraja.S.Nair,aged 30 years, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Managing Director, - Opp.Party(s)

22 Sep 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Civil Station ,
Kollam-691013.
Kerala.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/78/2022
( Date of Filing : 10 Mar 2022 )
 
1. Neeraja.S.Nair,aged 30 years,
D/o.Sreekandan Nair,Kokkalathu House,Puthensanketham, Koivila.P.O, Thevalakkara,Kollam.
2. Adarsh.G.S,aged 33 years,
S/o.Gopalakrishna Pillai, Kokkalathu House,Puthensanketham, Koivila.P.O, Thevalakkara,Kollam.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Managing Director,
Family Super Market, Puthenchanda,Mynagappally,Kunnathoor Taluk,Kollam.
2. K.K.R.Products and Marketing Pvt.Ltd,
(Nirapara),Okkal.P.O,Kalady Ernakulam, Kerala,India,Pin-683550.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLLAM

DATED THIS THE 22ndDAY OF SEPTEMBER2022

Present: -    Sri.E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LLM. President

                     Smt.S.Sandhya   Rani. Bsc, LLB ,Member

        Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A.LLB, Member

CC.No.78/2022

  1. NeerajaS.Nair, 30 years,

          D/o SreekantanNair,Kokkalathuveedu,

         Puthensanketham, Koivila P.O.,

          Thevalakkara, Kollam.                                                                             :               Complainants

  1. Adarsh G.S., aged 33 years,

     S/o Gopalakrishna Pillai,

          Kokkalathu House, Puthensanketham,

          Koivila P.O.,Thevalakkara, Kollam.    

   V/s

  1. Managing Director,

     Family Super Market,

        Puthenchantha, Mynagappally,

         KunnathoorTaluk, Kollam.

  1. K.K.R.Products and Marketing Pvt.Ltd.,

     (Nirapara), Okkal P.O., Kalady,

     Ernakulam,  683550.                                                                                  :          Opposite parties

ORDER

Sri. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LLM,President

          Complainant absent.  No representation though notice was issued and served directing the complainant to appear and give exparte evidence and there is no representation even for the complainant.  The complainant absent no representation even for the complaint.  The allegations in the complaint is of a serious nature and without reliable materials the complaint cannot be allowed.  Complainant filed to adduce evidence though sufficient opportunity was granted.  Hence we are inclined to dismiss the complaint for want of evidence.

            In the result complaint stands dismissed.

            No costs.

Dated this the 22nd day of September 2022.

 

E.M .MUHAMMED IBRAHIM:Sd/-

S.SANDHYA RANI:Sd/-

                                                                                                STANLY HAROLD:Sd/-

Forwarded/by Order

                       

                                                                                                            Senior superintendent

                                                                                          

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.