DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM PALAKKAD
Dated this the 31st day of October 2011
Present : Smt.Seena H, President
: Smt. Preetha.G. Nair, Member
: Smt. Bhanumathi.A.K, Member Date of filing: 29/06/2011
(C.C.No.95/2011)
A.V.Paili,
S/o.Varkey,
Amayaparambil House,
(PO) Mannuthy, Mullakkara,
Mulayam Road, Thrissur – 680 651
(By Adv.B.Kamal Chand) - Complainant
V/s
1.Sree Lakshmi Kuries & Loans P.Ltd.
Corporate Office,
Sree Lakshmi Tower,
East Fort Road,
Kottamaidhanam, Palakkad
(Rep.by Managing Director
Sudhakaran.P.V)
2. Sudhakaran.P.V.
(Managing Director,
Sree Lakshmi Kuries & Loans P.Ltd.)
S/o.Velayudhan,
Poolackaparambil House,
Nenmmara, Ayiloor (PO).
(By Adv.C.Madhavankutty) - Opposite parties
O R D E R
By Smt.SEENA.H. PRESIDENT
Brief facts of the complaint:-
Complainant joined in a Kuri conducted by the opposite parties and full amount was paid towards the Chitty. When he approached the opposite party company for the chitty amount, it is seen that the company has been closed. Hence complainant claiming the amount paid along with interest, cost & compensation.
Opposite party filed a statement stating as per Section 446 of the Companies Act, No Court can proceed against the company when a winding up order has been passed and official liquidator appointed. Judgment of Hon’ble High Court also produced.
Both parties heard regarding the preliminary issue. As per the order of the Hon’ble High Court, it is seen that the opposite party company has been wind up and official liquidator has been appointed. In view of the said circumstances, the complainant has to approach the official liquidator for relief. Hence complaint dismissed with direction to approach the official liquidator for relief.
Pronounced in the open court on this the 31st day of October 2011.
Sd/-
Seena.H
President
Sd/-
Preetha G Nair
Member
Sd/-
Bhanumathi.A.K.
Member
