The case record is posted today for further hearing. Neither the complainant nor his Advocate is present nor taken any step. The Advocate for O.Ps No.2 to 4 is present and files a memo. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, the O.Ps No.2 to 4 were appeared and filed w/v, whereas the notices against O.Ps No.1 & 5 were sufficient. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 06.02.2018 to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. On the other hand, the Advocate for the O.Ps No.2 to 4 filed a memo stating that the complainant remained absent since long, for which the case may be dismissed. Considering the memo submitted by the O.Ps No.2 to 4 and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous.