Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/58/2017

Sanjay Kumar Mohanty, aged 49 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

Managing Director, M/s. Muthoot Finance Ltd., Kochi - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. Ramnarayan Dey & Others

23 May 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/58/2017
( Date of Filing : 22 Aug 2017 )
 
1. Sanjay Kumar Mohanty, aged 49 years
S/o. Late Ramesh Chandra Mohanty, At- Fakir Mohan Nagar (Mz- Karanjia), P.S- Sadar, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Managing Director, M/s. Muthoot Finance Ltd., Kochi
2nd Floor, Muthoot Chambers, Banarjee Road, Kochi-682018.
Kerala
2. Regional Manager, M/s. Muthoot Finance Ltd., Bhubaneswar
3rd Floor, MJ Plaza, Plot No.760, Cuttack-Puri Road, P.S- Laxmi Sagar, P.O- Bhubaneswar.
Khurda
Odisha
3. Branch Manager, M/s. Muthoot Finance Ltd., Balasore
Ground Floor, Police Line Square, O.T Road, P.S- Sahadevkhunta, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sj. Priyabrata Nayak, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 23 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case record is posted today for hearing. Advocate for the Op No.3 files hazira & present. Neither the learned counsel for the complainant is present nor taken any step. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Thus, the hearing of the case could not be taken up. O.ps No.1 & 2 are also absent. 

                                         In the present case, though Op No.3 was appeared, but no written version is filed on his behalf. As it appears from the case record, the complainant remained absent and slept over the matter from 24.04.2018 to 30.10.2018 and from 21.05.2019 till today and no step is taken nor did his advocate take any step on his behalf. From the above nature and conduct of the complainant, it is clearly made out that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his case, for which valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.          

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed earlier against the Ops shall remain infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.