Date of filing:      04.03.2019
                                                                                                                   Date of disposal: 27.12.2022

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                  .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU.P.MURUGAN,M.Com.ICWA(Inter),B.L.,                                       ....MEMBER-II

RBT/CC. No.76/2022
THIS TUESDAY, THE 27th DAY OF DECEMBER 2022
(CC.No.66/2019 sent from DCDRC, Chennai North)

1.Mr.Muthusamy,
   S/o.Late Mr.Sadaiappan,

2.Mrs.Anuradha Muthusamy,
   W/o.Muthusamy,

   Both residing at Plot No.105-B,
   Bharathi Street, VGP Shanthi Nagar,
   Pallikaranai, Chennai 600 100.                                                       ……Complainant.     
                                                                          //Vs//
1.The Managing Director,
    ETA General Private Limited,
    R.S.No.79, 80 and 81.
    Kalitheer – Thalakuppam Village,
    Madagadipet, Pondicherry – 605 107.

2.ETA General Private Limited,
    R.S.No.79, 80 and 81.
    Kalitheer – Thalakuppam Village,
    Madagadipet, Pondicherry – 605 107.

3.The Proprietor,
   Jayam & Company,
   AA 147, III Avenue,
   Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040.

4.The Proprietor,
    Retrofit,
   34, Perumal Mudali Street,
   Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.                                              .......Opposite parties. 
                         
This complaint has been filed before DCDRC, Chennai (North) as CC.No.69/2019 and transferred to this commission by the order of the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai and taken on file as CC.No.76/2022.             
  The complaint was filed by the complainant under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service in selling a defective product along with a prayer to direct the opposite parties to provide the complainants with a new Air conditioner unit replacing the defective Air Conditioner and to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony and hardship caused to the complainant due to the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite parties. 
No representation for both inspite of service of notice.  Proof affidavit not filed by the complainant. Sufficient opportunities given for filing  proof affidavit and for appearance on 26.08.2022, 13.09.2022, 19.09.2022, 06.10.2022, 19.10.2022, 01.11.2022, 15.11.2022, 28.11.2022, 13.12.2022  and on 27.12.2022. In spite of the same, complainant failed to appear and prosecute the case. Hence, this commission is of the view that no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence the consumer complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 27th December 2022. 

   Sd/-                                                                                                              Sd/-

MEMBER-II                                                                                                  PRESIDENT