Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/102/2015

Venkatesan, S/o Mr.Kannan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Managing Director, Escorts Construction Equipment Ltd, and anr - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. T.D.Vengatesh

25 Oct 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

           BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                   Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.102/2015

                                                          DATED THE 25^TH  DAY OF OCTOBER  2021

 

Venkatesan

Son of Kannan

No.18, Varadappan Street

Ambal Nagar, Oli Muhammad Pettai

Kanchipuram District

Tamil Nadu

                                                                               .. Complainant.

 

-Versus-

1. Managing Director

    Escorts Construction Equipment Limited

    Plot No.219, Sector 58, Ballabgarh District

    Faridabad 121 004

    Haryana

 

2. Manager

    SREI Equipment  Finance Pvt.Ltd.

    No. 290, Mahalakshmi Building

    Peters Road, Gopalapuram

    Chennai 600 086

                                                                              .. Opposite Parties.

 

 Counsel for the complainant                    : M/s. T.D. Venkatesh

 Counsel for the opposite party 1              : M/s. T.V. Sekar

 Counsel for the opposite party 2              : M/s. M.K. Kannan

 

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 25.10.2021 for hearing. Due to non-representation of the complainant, this Commission made the following order:-

                                            

Docket order

 

            No representation for complainant and opposite party 2. 1^st opposite party present. Today this matter is posted for filing proof affidavit of opposite party 2 and for filling written arguments of opposite party 1 and 2, and for arguments (list). When this matter was called at 11.00 a.m, there was no representation for complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.45 noon, the complainant was again not present. Written arguments also not filed. Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                   Sd/-                                                                                                     Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT