Kerala

Kollam

CC/300/2016

Charli.W,S/o.William, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Managing Director/ Chief Executive, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.A.OMANAKUTTAN.

26 Sep 2018

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station , Kollam.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/300/2016
( Date of Filing : 21 Dec 2016 )
 
1. Charli.W,S/o.William,
Thannickavila,Koduvila.P.O,Sinkarappally,East Kallada,Kollam-691502.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Managing Director/ Chief Executive,
M/s.International Cars and Motors Ltd.Village Chak Gujran.P.O,Piplawalan,Jalandhar Road,Hoshiarpur-146001(Pb).
2. Daiwik Motors Pvt.Ltd.Code No.28041,
Jane & Jane Arcade,Cheppally Jn,Sakthikulangara,Kollam.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. M.PRAVEENKUMAR MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 26 Sep 2018
Final Order / Judgement

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOLLAM

            DATED THIS THE 26TH  DAY OF September 2018

 

Present: -    Sri. E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LLM. President

       Sri. M.Praveen Kumar,Bsc, LLB ,Member

 

    CC.No.300/2016

Charli.W                                                    :                  Complainant

S/o William

Thannickavila, Koduvila P.O

Sinkarappally, East Kallada

Kollam – 691 502

[By Adv. A.Omanakuttan , Kollam]

V/S

  1.         M/s International Cars and   :                 Opposite parties

                  Motors Ltd , Village Chak Gujran P.O

                   Piplawalan, Jalandhar Road

                   Hoshiarpur- 146001 (Pb)

                   (Represented by its Managing Director/ Chief Executive)

                   [By Adv. Jyothisagar.V, Kollam]

 

          2.      Daiwik Motors Pvt.Ltd, Code No.28041

                   Jane & Jane Arcade

                   Cheppally Junction

                   Sakthikulangara, Kollam

                   [By Adv.S.Riyas, Kollam]

ORDER

Sri. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LLM,President

            Complainant absent. Counsel for the complainant submits that he has no instructions from the complainant. Opposite party 1’s counsel present.

          As the complainant is regularly absent and the counsel for the complainant expressed no instruction we are of  the  view that the complainant is not interested in proceeding with the case.

          In the result complaint stands dismissed for default. No costs.

       Dated this the 26th day of September 2018.

 

                                                                                                E.M .MUHAMMED IBRAHIM:Sd/-

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              M.PRAVEENKUMAR:Sd/-

                                                                                                Forwarded/by Order

                                                                                                Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. M.PRAVEENKUMAR]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.