Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/118/2023

Pranav C - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager,Movable the furniture store - Opp.Party(s)

31 May 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/118/2023
( Date of Filing : 15 Mar 2023 )
 
1. Pranav C
Sasthamangalam,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Manager,Movable the furniture store
venpalavattam,chackai
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 31 May 2024
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER 

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No.118/2023 Filed on 15/03/2023

ORDER DATED: 31/05/2024

 

Complainant

:

Pranav.S, 8B, Heather Corniche, Sasthamangalam, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 010.

(By Adv.Sreevaraham N.G.Mahesh)

Opposite party

:

The Manager, Movable the Furniture Store, NH Bypass Road, Venpalavattom, Chakkai, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 029.

(Ex parte)

 

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party.  After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite party.  After accepting the notice opposite party failed to appear before this Commission and hence on 21/07/2023, the opposite party is called absent and set ex parte.  When the case came up for consideration today the complainant’s counsel filed a memo stating that the matter is settled and the complainant is not willing to further proceed with this complaint.  The memo filed by the counsel appearing for the complainant contains the signature of the complainant as well as the counsel.  The memo filed by the counsel appearing for the complainant is accepted and recorded.  In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the proceedings, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled. 

In the result the complaint is dismissed as settled.  There will be no order as to cost. 

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 31st  day of May,  2024.

 

            Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN                 : PRESIDENT 

 

          Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR              : MEMBER    

 

         Sd/-

VIJU V.R                          : MEMBER

                                                                                     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.