View 1119 Cases Against Furniture
Mahendralal.N filed a consumer case on 25 Jun 2022 against Manager,Mayoori Furniture in the Thiruvananthapuram Consumer Court. The case no is CC/149/2021 and the judgment uploaded on 01 Jul 2022.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION
VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PRESENT
SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
SMT.PREETHA.G.NAIR : MEMBER
SRI.VIJU.V.R. : MEMBER
CC .No.149/2021 (Filed on : 03.04.2021)
ORDER: 25.06.2022
COMPLAINANT
Mahendralal.N
Mohanavilasam,
Vazhamuttom,Pachallur.P.O
Trivandrum - 695027
(Party in person)
VS
OPPOSITE PARTY
The Manager,
Mayoori Furniture Electronic and Home Appliances,
Manacaud.P.O, Trivandrum – 695009
(Exparte)
ORDER
SRI. VIJU V.R. : MEMBER
The complainant has presented this complaint before this Commission under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, alleging that he had purchased a Spanio 24 inch TV from opposite party’s shop on 13/12/2020. When the complainant brought it home & operated it, he heard only noise & it became non functional within two seconds. The complainant informed all these things to the manager of the opposite party & returned the TV to the opposite party on 31/12/2020. But the opposite party haven’t given a new TV nor repaid the amount of the TV to the complainant. The act of opposite party amounts to deficiency in service, hence this complaint.
Even though the opposite party received notice, the opposite party did not appear before this commission and opposite party was set exparte.
Issues to be ascertained:
Issues (i) and (ii)
The complainant had filed affidavit in-lieu of chief examination and has produced 3 documents which were marked as Ext. P1 to P3. It can be seen from Ext P1 that the complainant has purchased the TV from the opposite party & also returned it to the opposite party on 31/12/2020 &from Ext P2 it is clear that there is 24 months warranty to the TV from the date of purchase. The opposite party did not turn up. Hence the deposition of the complainant stands unshaken and there is nothing to rebut the evidence put forth by the complainant. The opposite party is bound to replace the TV or repay the amount received from the complainant. But they haven’t done that. From the documents produced by the complainant, we find that the complainant has succeeded in proving his case & there is deficiency in service from the side of opposite party. Hence the opposite party is liable to compensate the complainant.
In the result, the complaint is allowed. The opposite party is directed to repay Rs 6000/- with 6 % interest per annum from 13/12/2020 and pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation to the complainant for the mental agony suffered by the complainant and Rs.2,500/- towards the cost of the proceedings within one month from the date of receipt of this order failing which Rs 10,000/- will carry an interest @ 9% per annum from the date of order till realisation.
A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.
Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Forum, this the 25th day of June 2022.
Sd/-
P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
Sd/-
PREETHA .G.NAIR: MEMBER
Sd/-
VIJU.V.R : MEMBER
Be/
APPENDIX
CC.NO.149/2021
List of witness for the complainant
PW1 - Mahendralal.N
Exhibits for the complainant
Ext.P1 - Copy of bill
Ext.P2 - Copy of warranty card
Ext.P3 - Copy of advertisement
List of witness for the opposite party - NIL
Exhibits for the opposite party - NIL
Court Exhibits - NIL
Sd/-
PRESIDENT
BEFORE THE DISTRICT
CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
CC .No.149/2021
ORDER: 25.06.2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.