Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/78/2024

Rahul - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager,Go digit General insurance - Opp.Party(s)

27 Nov 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/78/2024
( Date of Filing : 06 Feb 2024 )
 
1. Rahul
tvpm
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Manager,Go digit General insurance
tvpm
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Nov 2024
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

 

C.C.No.78/2024 Filed on 06/02/2024

ORDER DATED: 27/11/2024

 

 

Complainant

:

Rahul.Y, Raj Nivas, TRA E-4, Thundathil.P.O., Thiruvananthapuram – 695 581.

                     (By Adv.N.G.Mahesh)

Opposite party

:

The Manager, Go Digit General Insurance Ltd., Atlantis, 95, 4th B cross Road, Koramangala industrial Layout, 5th Block, bengaluru – 560 095.

(By Adv.Rinu.S.Aswan)

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party.  After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite party.  The said notice was accepted by the opposite party on 01/05/2024.  After accepting the notice the opposite party failed to appear before this Commission and not filed written version and hence on 15/06/2024, the opposite party was called absent and set ex parte.  When the case came up for consideration today, both parties represented and the complainant’s counsel filed a memo singed by the complainant stating that the complainant is not willing to further proceed with this complaint.  The memo filed by the complainant’s counsel is accepted and recorded.  In view of the memo filed by the complainant’s counsel, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as not pressed. 

In the result the complaint is dismissed.  There will be no order as to cost.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 27th  day of November,  2024.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.