Orissa

Nabarangapur

CC/77/2017

Bidyadhar Panigri - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager/Drector, Peregrine guarding pvt.ltd., New Delhi - Opp.Party(s)

Self

22 Feb 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NABARANGPUR
Heading 2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/77/2017
( Date of Filing : 09 Aug 2017 )
 
1. Bidyadhar Panigri
At/Prajapati Bramhakumari, Po/Umeakote
Nabarangpur
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Manager/Drector, Peregrine guarding pvt.ltd., New Delhi
Kapashera crossing, New Delhi
New Delhi
2. The APFC, EP Organisation
28, Community centre,Wazipur, Industrial Area, New Delhi.
New Delhi
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. GOPAL KRISHNA RATH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MEENAKHI PADHI MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. RAMA SANKAR NAYAK MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 22 Feb 2018
Final Order / Judgement

      SRI G.K. RATH, PRESIDENT …                The factual matrix of case is that, the complainant was working under the OP.1 vide A/c no. DL/29027/48493. He contends that he has submitted F-19 & 10C along with required documents to OP.2 for payment of EPF & FPF but he has not yet received the same from the OP.s. So he contends that he has submitted several persuasions to the OP.s but for no result, hence alleges there is deficiency in service on the part of OP.s. Further he contends that, due to non issuance of EPF amount he inflicted mental and financial losses, so prayed to allow the entire claims along with a sum of Rs.80,000/- as compensation and Rs.10000/- as cost.

2.         The OP.no.1 has filed written counter and averred that the case is not maintainable. The forum has no jurisdiction to entertain the same as it is not coming under its ambit and prayed to dismiss the complaint with cost.

3.         The counsel for OP.2 has filed nothing except his vakalatnama.

4.         Without going through the unwarranted details, prima facie, it reflects from record that the complainant made two parties and no one is coming under the jurisdiction of this forum in any manner and it is also seen that the cause of action as well as the transactions as explained by the complainant wholly arouse at New Delhi which is out of the judicature of this forum. So the entire claim of complainant and titles of OP.s did not reaches the local limit of this forum as provisions envisaged in sec.11 of C.P.Act 1986 hence it is not maintainable. Accordingly we dismiss the present complaint with an order as to no cost. However the complainant is at liberty to knock the door of appropriate competent court/forum to redress his grievance. Pronounced in the open forum on 22nd day of Feb’2018.

                  Sd/-                                 Sd/-                                   Sd/-

            MEMBER                    MEMBER                        PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. GOPAL KRISHNA RATH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MEENAKHI PADHI]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAMA SANKAR NAYAK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.