DATE OF FILING: 5.10.2009

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI

Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010

Present:

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN PRESIDENT

SMT.SHEELA JACOB MEMBER

SMT.BINDU SOMAN MEMBER

C.C No.188/2009

Between

Complainant : Silvy W/o Ruby,

Vettukallel House,

Pazhayarikandam P.O,

Idukki District.

(By Adv:Biju Vasudevan)

And

Opposite Parties :

1. The Manager,

Union Bank of India,

Chelachuvadu,

Idukki District.

(By Adv: Sibi Thomas)

2. The Regional Manager,

Union Bank of India,

Union Bank Tower,

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 001.

3. The Deputy Tahsildar(RR),

Taluk Office,

Thodupuzha, Idukki District.

O R D E R

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)

Complainant absent. No representation. Opposite party appeared through counsel and submitted that the complainant is interested to continue the case because he is continuously absent. Opposite party's counsel submitted that the matter concerned is Sericulture and not partially agriculture; so the opposite party cannot include the entire amount in the Debt Waiver Scheme of the Government. Some amount has been included in the scheme and benefit also given. The opposite party is not interested to proceed against the complainant coercively if the complainant pays some portion of the due amount. Hence the petition dismissed.

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 31st day of March, 2010

Sd/-

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)

Sd/-

I agree SMT.SHEELA JACOB(MEMBER)

 Sd/-

I agree SMT.BINDU SOMAN(MEMBER)