D.o.F:6/1/2014
D.o.O:08/08/2014
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD
CC.NO.6/14
Dated this, the 8th day of August 2014
PRESENT:
SMT.P.RAMADEVI : PRESIDENT
SMT.BEENA K.G : MEMBER
SMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL : MEMBER
Sakeer.C.H , S/o Muhammed,
Chirammal House, West Eleri PO,
Hosdurg Taluk, Nileshwar via,Kasaragod. : Complainant
(in person)
1.Manager, My Fone Solutions,
City Mall Building, Near Bus stand
Kanhangad Po.Kanhangad.
2. Nokia India Sales Pvt.Ltd, : Opposite parties
SP Infocity Industrial Plot-243,-
Udyog Vihar Phase Ist Bundahera,
Gargoan 122016, Hariyana. (In person)
ORDER
SMT.P.RAMADEVI : PRESIDENT
The facts of the complaint in brief are that the complainant purchased a mobile phone from Ist opposite party for an amount of Rs.3850/-. The mobile phone has got warranty. But the mobile phone is not functioning properly. Then he entrusted the phone to the Ist opposite party for repair. But the Ist opposite party failed to return back the phone in time then the complainant lodged a complaint before the police and in the presence of police the Ist opposite party given back the phone but it was not repaired. Thereafter the opposite party has not replaced the mobile phone. Hence the complaint.
Ist opposite party served notice and filed his version stating that he is only a dealer and manufacturer is a necessary party to the complaint. Then subsequently manufacturer was impleaded as 2nd opposite party and issued notice to 2nd opposite party, he served notice and entered in appearance and settled the claim. 2nd opposite party returned the price of the mobile phone and paid Rs.1000/- as cost.
Thereafter the complainant represented that he is further proceeding against Ist opposite party.
Heard the complainant. Upon hearing the complainant we are of the opinion that since the claim is settled by the manufacturer , dealer is not liable to compensate the complainant. Hence the complaint is closed.
MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT
eva
