Bihar

Gaya

CC/33/2015

Rakesh Kumar Sinha - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager - Opp.Party(s)

Alok Kumar

09 May 2017

ORDER

In the court of District Consumer Forum, Gaya

Consumer Complainant Case No. - 33 of 2015

Rakesh Kumar Sinha son of late Kedarnath Sinha resident of Tulip School, Chandchaura Police Station - Civil Lines, District- Gaya....... complainant

                                      Vs
Divisional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited at R.J Place, Kashinath mode, P.S. Civil Lines, District - Gaya .......Opposite Party.

Present:
 1. Shri Ramesh Chandra Singh..... President

 2. Syed Mohtashim Akhtar....Male Member

 3. Smt. Sunita Kumari ....Female Member

       Dated:- 09^th May of

                                                ORDER

              1. The instant case has been filed by the complainant Rakesh Kumar Sinha against the opposite party Divisional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, R.J Place, Kashinath more, P.S. Civil Lines, District -Gaya

                                              Case No. - 33 of 2015

for breach of service  as the opposite party repudiated the claim of the complainant. He has claimed ₹

                     2. In brief the case of the complainant is that the complainant is the registered owner of Sumo Grande bearing Registration No.BR.-2K-/31/ 

                                              Case No. - 33 of 2015

surveyor who submitted his report to said Insurance Company. The complainant took the damaged Sumo to the Pareena Motors Private Limited, Gaya and got repair the said vehicle and paid ₹ 23,

               3. Despite the notice was served to the opposite party, he did not appear before the court and then the case was heard exparte.

                                              Case No. - 33 of 2015

                4.  The Complainant has filed evidence on affidavit and documents in support of his case. He has filed Job Card, Money Receipts dated                          5. The complainant has not filed insurance paper of the said vehicle, copy of Registration of the vehicle.

                         6. The complainant in his evidence on affidavit has accepted that the Opposite party, the Oriental Insurance Company Limited has refused to pay the expenses made by the complainant to repair the vehicle stating there in that the said vehicle Sumo No. BR-2K

                                              Case No. - 33 of 2015

The sole contention of the complainant is that  the opposite party has not demanded the Registration Book of the vehicle at the time of reinsurance.The letter dated 28 June

                       7. Since the complainant has not produced the Registration Book, copy of the Policy paper before this court to ascertain the truth,hence  it is clear from  own version of the complainant and the letter sent to the complainant by the opposite party dated 28 June

                                              Case No. - 33 of 2015

vehicle before this court and hence it clearly appears that contention of the complainant is not acceptable that the opposite party had not asked him to produce the registration book and the vehicle was  not reinsured but it was renewed and in case of renewal of the insurance nothing is required.

                     8. Hence, after considering the evidence on affidavit filed by the complainant and the documents produced by him before this court we are of the opinion that the complainant has renewed the policy of his vehicle Sumo Registration No.BR-BK-

           Dictated and corrected

Female Member         Male Member                          President

Sunita Kumari               Syed Mohtashim Akhtar       Ramesh Chandra Singh