Kerala

Kasaragod

C.C.No.84/2006

Prakashan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager - Opp.Party(s)

30 Sep 2008

ORDER


IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD
CDRF,Fort Road,Kasaragod
consumer case(CC) No. C.C.No.84/2006

Prakashan
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Manager
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. K.T.Sidhiq 2. P.P.Shymaladevi 3. P.Ramadevi

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. Prakashan

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Manager

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Date of filing : 22-07-2006 Date of order : 29-09-2008 IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD CC.84/06 Dated this, the 29th day of September 2008 PRESENT SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ : PRESIDENT SMT.P.RAMADEVI : MEMBER SMT.P.P.SHYMALADEVI : MEMBER Prakashan, S/o.M.C. Balakrishnan, } Complainant Varikkulam Veedu, Kolathur.Po, Chengala.Via, Kasaragod.Dt. Manager, Good Night Rubberised Coir & Form Mattress, } Opposite parties Stadium Complex, Near Global Traders, Kannur. O R D E R SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ, PRESIDENT Complaint of Prakashan in brief is that he purchased one Bed for Rs.4300/- and a mixie for Rs.3200/- from opposite party through their agent Shameer. The mixie was purchased by exchanging his old mixie for Rs.800/-. Thus he paid Rs.6700/- for Bed & Mixie. But the mixer grinder became defective within 2 days of it’s purchase. The mixer grinder was provided with a guarantee of 1 year. Even though he contacted the opposite party over phone several times they told that they will repair the mixer grinder. But till date it was neither repaired nor replaced. 2. The mixer grinder supplied by opposite party was inferior quality and hence uselss. There fore the opposite party is liable either to replace the mixer grinder or to refund the price of the same with a compensation of Rs.10,000/-. 3. Notice to opposite party issued by registered post. It was returned with endorsement ‘Not known’. Hence notice through substituted service by publication in a daily is ordered or accordingly publication of notice to opposite party is produced. Even then opposite party remained absent. Hence opposite party set exparte. 4. Prakashan examined as PW1 and Exts A1 & A2 marked. Claim of complainant is proved. Hence the complaint is allowed and the opposite party is directed to refund a sum of Rs.4300/- the purchase price of the mixer grinder with a compensation of Rs.5000/- towards the mental agony, loss and hardships sustained to him along with a cost of Rs.1500/-. Time for compliance 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT Exts. A1. Cash receipt. A2. Instruction Mannual PW1. Prakshan. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT Pj/ Forwarded by Order SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT




......................K.T.Sidhiq
......................P.P.Shymaladevi
......................P.Ramadevi