Uttarakhand

StateCommission

A/428/2019

Pulkit Shukla - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager, U.P. Automobile - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Anoop Prakash Bhardwaj

28 Mar 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
23/16, Circular Road, Dalanwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001
Dehradun-248001
Final Order
 
First Appeal No. A/428/2019
( Date of Filing : 03 Dec 2019 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/10/2019 in Case No. 314/2018 of District Haridwar)
 
1. Pulkit Shukla
s/o Prabhakar Shukla r/o H.No. 44 Rama Vihar Colony, Jamalpur Kalan, PO. Kankhal,
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Manager, U.P. Automobile
Ranipur More,
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
2. Manager, Hero Moto Corp Ltd.
34 Community Center, Basatlok Basant Vihar
New Delhi
Delhi
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 28 Mar 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Case is called out.

None is present on behalf of the appellant.

Sh. Rajeev Muyal, Advocate, holding brief of Sh. T.S. Bindra, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 is present.  None is present on behalf of respondent No. 2.

No adjournment application has also been moved on behalf of the appellant.

Perusal of record reveals that none was also present on behalf of the appellant on the previous date, i.e., 14.03.2023, on which date, following order was passed by this Commission:

“Case is called out.

None is present on behalf of the appellant.

Vide order dated 11.10.2022, office was directed to issue court notice to the appellant, as none was present on behalf of the appellant on the said date too.

According to office report dated 14.03.2023, registered court notice was issued to the appellant on 21.10.2022, which is received back in the office with postal endorsement that the appellant is not traceable on the given address inspite of sufficient efforts.

Further, according to office report dated 14.03.2023, registered court notice was issued to the appellant on the same address, which was mentioned in the memo of appeal.

However, in the interest of justice, one more opportunity is provided to the appellant.

Put up on 28.03.2023 for hearing.”

Inspite of that, none has appeared on behalf of the appellant even today.

It appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in default of the appellant.

Let the record be consigned.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.