Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/12/179

T.K.Gopikrishnan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager, Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

18 Jun 2012

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/179
 
1. T.K.Gopikrishnan
S/o.Late T.K.Kunhi Raman, Raja Road, Nileshwar.Po.
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Manager, Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd
LLA Building, IInd Floor, 735, Anna Salai, chennai.2.
Kasaragod
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE P.Ramadevi Member
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

                                                                            Date of filing   :  25-05-2012 

                                                                            Date of order  :   13-06-2012

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                                CC.179/2012

                         Dated this, the  13th    day of   June    2012

PRESENT

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ                                             : PRESIDENT

SMT.P.RAMADEVI                                      : MEMBER

SMT. K.G.BEENA                                        : MEMBER

 

T.K.Gopi Krishnan,                                           } Complainant

S/o. Late.T.K. Kunhi Raman,

Raja Road, Nileshwar, Po. Nileshwar,

Kasaragod Dist.

(In Person)

 

Tamil Nadu Cements corporation Ltd,          } Opposite party

L.L.A. Building, IInd Floor, 735 Anna Sali,

Chennai.2. Rep. by its Manager

                                                                        O R D E R  

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ, PRESIDENT       

            Complainant’s father T.K. Kunhiraman was a stockist of Arsu Cement produced by the opposite party.  He deposited `10,000/- towards security deposit.  After his demise complainant inherited to his  business.  Subsequently the stockistship is transferred  in his name. Now  he stopped the business and asked the opposite party to refund the security deposit.  But so far it is not returned. Hence the complaint.

            Heard the complainant.  Upon  hearing the complaint it appears that complainant is not a consumer and the dispute mentioned herein is  not a consumer dispute. Hence the complaint is dismissed in limini.

 

MEMBER                                           MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT

Pj/

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE P.Ramadevi]
Member
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.