Manager Meridian Mobile Pvt Ltd. V/S Rachhpal Singh - Consumer Court Case

Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/09/217

Rachhpal Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager Meridian Mobile Pvt Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh.Mohinder Singh Advocate

21 Dec 2009

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/217

Rachhpal Singh						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Manager Meridian Mobile Pvt Ltd. S.K. Enterprises, Shree Ganpati Telecome,						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh.Ganesh Dutt Sharma,counsel for the opposite party No.3. Stated that opposite party No.3 is ready to replace mobile hand set with new one of Fly Co.Model V-100(i) against the mobile hand set with fresh warranty of one year from today in question which is custody in the complainant within 05 days from today . The complainant shall deliver the old mobile hand set in question at the same time to the opposite party No.3. RO&AC Member Member D.C.F. 21.12.09. Statement of Sh.Rachhpal Singh son of Sh.Hari Singh aged about 32 years Resident of Vill.Jethuke Patti Kewal,Teh.Phul Distt.Bathinda, complainant on oath alongwith his counsel Sh.Jaspal Singh W.O. Stated that I accept the offer of opposite party No.3 as stated by Sh.Ganesh Dutt Sharma,counsel for opposite party No.3 . In view of the statement of Sh.Ganesh Dutt Sharma, I may kindly be allowed to withdraw the complaint. I shall handover the mobile hand set in question to opposite party No.3 through their counsel at same time. RO&AC Member Member D.C.F. 21.12.09 21.12.09 Present: Sh. Rachhpal Singh,complainant in person with his counsel Sh.Jaspal Singh. Sh.Ganesh Dutt,counsel for opposite party No.3. Counsel for the opposite party No.3 and complainant have made the above statements, they are bound by their statements. In view of statements of the complainant and learned counsel for the opposite party No.3, the complaint is disposed of. The opposite party No.3 is directed to replace mobile hand set with new one of Fly Co.Model V-100(i) against the mobile hand set in question with fresh warranty of one year from today with in five days from today and the complainant is directed to handover the old mobile set in question to the opposite party No.3 at the same time. File be consigned. Member Member D.C.F.

Statement of Sh.Ganesh Dutt Sharma,counsel for the opposite party No.3. Stated that opposite party No.3 is ready to replace mobile hand set with new one of Fly Co.Model V-100(i) against the mobile hand set with fresh warranty of one year from today in question which is custody in the complainant within 05 days from today . The complainant shall deliver the old mobile hand set in question at the same time to the opposite party No.3. RO&AC Member Member D.C.F. 21.12.09. Statement of Sh.Rachhpal Singh son of Sh.Hari Singh aged about 32 years Resident of Vill.Jethuke Patti Kewal,Teh.Phul Distt.Bathinda, complainant on oath alongwith his counsel Sh.Jaspal Singh W.O. Stated that I accept the offer of opposite party No.3 as stated by Sh.Ganesh Dutt Sharma,counsel for opposite party No.3 . In view of the statement of Sh.Ganesh Dutt Sharma, I may kindly be allowed to withdraw the complaint. I shall handover the mobile hand set in question to opposite party No.3 through their counsel at same time. RO&AC Member Member D.C.F. 21.12.09 21.12.09 Present: Sh. Rachhpal Singh,complainant in person with his counsel Sh.Jaspal Singh. Sh.Ganesh Dutt,counsel for opposite party No.3. Counsel for the opposite party No.3 and complainant have made the above statements, they are bound by their statements. In view of statements of the complainant and learned counsel for the opposite party No.3, the complaint is disposed of. The opposite party No.3 is directed to replace mobile hand set with new one of Fly Co.Model V-100(i) against the mobile hand set in question with fresh warranty of one year from today with in five days from today and the complainant is directed to handover the old mobile set in question to the opposite party No.3 at the same time. File be consigned. Member Member D.C.F.