D.o.F:17/5/10 D.o.O: 31/7/10 IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD CC.113/10 Dated this, the 31st day of July 2010. PRESENT SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ : PRESIDENT SMT.P.RAMADEVI : MEMBER SMT.P.P.SYAMALADEVI : MEMBER Anilkumar.K.M, S/o Narayani.K.M, Achu Nivas, Anandashram PO, :Complainant Kasaragod (in person) Manager Madonna Gas Agencies, : Opposite party Kanhangad. (Exparte) ORDER SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ : PRESIDENT The case of the complainant in brief is that opposite party refused to release the gas connection to his mother Narayani when he approached with his mother on 15/5/10 on the ground that he refused to purchase the gas stove from opposite party. Therefore complaint claiming a compensation of ` 10,000 2. In response to the notice opposite party appeared and filed a statement that the connection is provided to the complainant on 23/6/10 and the matter is settled. Hence notice is issued to complainant for verifying the veracity of the statement filed by opposite party and the case is adjourned to 16/7/10 on that day complainant appeared before the Forum and submitted that the matter is not settled as stated by opposite party in his statement though he received the gas connection . Opposite party remained absent on that day and no version filed. Hence opposite party had to be set exparte. 3. Complainant examined as PW1 and marked Ext.A1 the copy of the communication letter dt.28/4/10. Complaint heard. 4. Complainant deposed that the opposite party refused to release his gas connection since he declined to purchase gas stove from them. He further deposed that though the connection is received on 23/6/10 the matter is not settled with opposite party and what is stated in the statement filed by opposite party is not correct. 5. The complaints regarding the deficiency in services and restrictive trade practices against gas agencies are widespread. This complaint is one of the best example of such a restrictive trade practice as defined U/S 2(1)(nnn)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act. Hence opposite party is liable to compensate the complainant for the loss, hardships and mental agony suffered by him. Therefore the complaint is allowed and opposite party is directed to pay ` 10,000/- to the complainant ( though the gas connection is released in the name of his mother) by way of compensation for the loss, hardships and mental agony suffered to him and to his mother Narayani on account of non release of gas connection when they approached to avail the gas connection in response to the communications sent by opposite party . Opposite party also liable to pay cost of `` 2000/- . Opposite party further directed to refrain from this type of restrictive trade practice and any complaints in future about such restrictive trade practice will be dealt severely. Time for compliance is limited to 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Failing which opposite party shall further liable to pay interest @12% per annum for ` 10,000/- from the date of complaint till payment. Sd/ Sd/ Sd/ MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT Ext.A1- dt.28/4/10 the copy of the communication letter PW1-Anilkumar-K.M. complainant Sd/ Sd/ Sd/ MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT eva /Forwarded by Order/ SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT
| HONORABLE P.P.Shymaladevi, Member | HONORABLE K.T.Sidhiq, PRESIDENT | HONORABLE P.Ramadevi, Member | |