Uttar Pradesh

StateCommission

A/2014/477

Nanak Chand Goel - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager Madhu Gas Agency - Opp.Party(s)

self

05 Aug 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UP
C-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010
 
First Appeal No. A/2014/477
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. Nanak Chand Goel
om prakash Goel 83 sadan puri kankar khera Meerut
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Manager Madhu Gas Agency
25 m D A Market Shardhapuri Kankar Khera Meerut
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Virendra Singh PRESIDENT
  Mr. Mohd. Rais Siddaqui REGISTRAR
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

                                   UTTAR PRADESH, LUCKNOW

                                      APPEAL NO. 477 OF 2014

                 (Against the judgment/order dated 23-01-2014 in Complaint

                 Case No. 221/2012 of the District Consumer Forum, Meerut)

 

Nanak Chand Goyal

S/o Late Sri Om Prakash Goyal

R/o 83, Sadanpuri, Kankarkhera

Meerut, U.P.

                                                                                       ...Appellants/Complainant  

 

                                                             Vs.

Manager

Madhu Gas Agency

25 M.D.A.Market

Shradhapuri, Kankarkhera

Meerut, U.P.   

                                                                                       ...Respondent/Opposite Party

BEFORE:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDRA SINGH, PRESIDENT

HON’BLE MR. UDAI SHANKAR AWASTHI, MEMBER

 

For the Appellant        :       None appears

For the Respondent     :               ...

Dated : 24-08-2014

                                                  JUDGMENT

          MR. JUSTICE VIRENDRA SINGH, PRESIDENT (ORAL)

               This appeal is put up today. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant.

               A perusal of the record shows that the impugned order was passed on 23-01-2014, the copy of which was received by the appellant on 07-02-2014 and the appeal is filed on 13-08-2014 which is apparently time barred. Since the appeal is time barred and even there is no application for any prayer for seeking condonation for delay, therefore, we do find it expedient that this appeal be dismissed being it time barred and is hereby dismissed accordingly.

               Let copy of the judgment be sent to both the parties free of cost forthwith.           

 

 

                                                                                     (JUSTICE VIRENDRA SINGH)

                                                                                                                     PRESIDENT

 

 

 

                                                                                                             ( U S AWASTHI )

                                                                                                                         MEMBER

 

 

Pnt.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Virendra Singh]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Mr. Mohd. Rais Siddaqui]
REGISTRAR

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.