Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/12/304

M.A SUNILDATT - Complainant(s)

Versus

MANAGER, INDUSIND BANK - Opp.Party(s)

31 Dec 2012

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/304
 
1. M.A SUNILDATT
MALIL VEEDU, RAJAGIRI P.O, KALAMASSERY-683 104
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MANAGER, INDUSIND BANK
ALUVA BRANCH, PUMP JUNCTION, ALUVA 683 101
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE MR. PROF:PAUL GOMEZ Member
 HONORABLE MRS. C.K.LEKHAMMA Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

cccccPBEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ERNAKULAM.

                       Dated this the 31st day of December 2012

                                                                                 Filed on : 18/05/2012

Present :

          Shri. A  Rajesh,                                                     President.

Shri. Paul Gomez,                                                 Member.

Smt. C.K. Lekhamma,                                           Member

                             C.C. No. 304/12

     Between

M.A. Sunildatt,                                   :        Complainant

Malil house, Rajagiri P.O.,                     (Party-in-person)

Kalamassery-683 104.

 

 

                                                And

 

Manager,                                          :         Opposite party

IndusInd Bank, Aluva Branch,                  (By Adv. Girish R,

Pump junction, Aluva-683 101.                Gem villa, Market road,

                                                                   Combara junction,

                                                                   Ernakulam)

                                               

                                          O R D E R

          A  Rajesh, President.

 

          The case of the complainant is as follows:

          The complainant availed a loan of Rs. 34,500/- on 12-08-2008 from the opposite party to purchase a motor bike.  The complainant repaid the loan amount as demanded by the opposite party.  Accordingly the opposite party issued a statement of account stating the dues as Zero. At that juncture the complainant requested the opposite party  to return the original RC book.  They agreed to return the same within a month.  While so on 13-11-2012 the complainant met with an accident and sustained serious injuries.  Along with the insurance claim the insurance company demanded the original RC book of the vehicle and no objection certificate from the opposite party.   Though the opposite party showed the RC book to the representative of the Insurance company they failed to hand it over   to the complainant.  The complainant repeatedly requested the opposite party to return the RC book.   They agreed to sent the RC book and NOC to his residential address by post.  But the opposite party failed   to do so.  Thus the complainant is before us seeking direction against the opposite party to handover the RC, to issue the no objection certificate and to pay a compensation of Rs. 10,000/-.  This complaint hence.

          2. The version of the opposite party is as follows:

          The opposite party granted a loan of Rs. 34,500/- to the complainant on  12-08-2008 on the basis of an agreement entered into between the complainant and the opposite party.    As per the loan agreement the complainant had  to remit all the dues outstanding in the loan account.  The complainant  is entitled to get back all the documents and NOC only after remitting the entire loan amount together with delayed interest and bank  charges. The complainant has no cause of action against the opposite party and the complaint is liable to be dismissed.

          3. No oral evidence was adduced by the parties.  Exts. A1 to A3 and  B1 were marked on the side of the complainant and the opposite party respectively. Heard the complainant who appeared in person  and the learned counsel for the opposite party.

          4. The only point that  arises for consideration is whether the complainant is entitled to get the documents and the NOC of the vehicle together with compensation of Rs.10,000/- from the opposite party?

          5. Admittedly the complainant availed himself of a vehicle loan to the tune of Rs. 34,500/- on 12-08-2008.  According to the complainant he has remitted the entire  amount in the loan account and is entitled to receive back  the  documents of the vehicle with no objection certificate.  The opposite party maintains that the complainant failed to remit  penal interest  and bank charges. Both the parties relying on the terms and conditions  in the loan agreement entered into between them.  Neither of the parties did take any steps to produce the same in this Forum for  our perusal.  However the complainant produced Ext. A3 statement of account which goes to show that the future due is Zero as on 27-07-2011.  Ext. B1 is the account statement of the opposite party,  Ext. B1 as well goes to show that the complainant is not liable to pay any amount to the opposite party in the loan account.

 

          6. Relying on the documents of non liability on the part of the complainant the opposite party has no grounds to retain the documents pertaining to the vehicle and the no-objection certificate.  May be on the brink of heavy work the opposite party has not yet done what they have to have which almost amounts to efficiency in service on their part which of course can be rectified in no time if they put their minds to it.  However the complainant has had to suffer mental agony and inconveniences.  We fix the compensation at Rs. 3,000/-.

 

          7.  In the result, we partly allow the complaint and direct as follows:

          i.  The opposite party shall forthwith release the RC book and related documents to the complainant .

          ii. The opposite party shall issue the no objection certificate to the complainant to get the endorsement of hypothecation in the RC book released.

          iii. The opposite party shall  pay Rs. 3,000/- to the complainant towards compensation.

          The above said order shall be complied with within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the order failing which the above amount shall carry interest at the rate of 12% p.a.  till realization.         

                    Pronounced in the open Forum on this the 31st day of December 2012.  

                                                                                    Sd/- A Rajesh, President.

                                                                   Sd/- Paul Gomez, Member

                                                                   Sd/- C.K. Lekhamma, Member.

 

                                                                   Forwarded/By Order,

 

 

 

                                                                   Senior Superintendent.

 

 

 

 

         

 

                                        

 

                                       Appendix

 

Complainant’s exhibits :

 

                             Ext.   A1               : Copy of  letter

                                      A2              : Copy of E-mail dt. 20-03-2012

                                      A3              : Copy of  Statement of account

                                                          dt. 27-07-2011                               

 

 Opposite party’s Exhibits :        :

 

                             Ext. B1                 : Copy of statement of account

                                                          dt. 04/11/2012   

 

 
 
[HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE MR. PROF:PAUL GOMEZ]
Member
 
[HONORABLE MRS. C.K.LEKHAMMA]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.