FINAL ORDER/JUDGEMENT
SHRI SWAPAN KUMAR MAHANTY, PRESIDENT
The facts, as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with it, are that Humara India Credit Co operative Society Ltd. is a Financial Institution. OP is the Manager of Humara India Credit Co operative Society Ltd. Complainant invested Rs. 4,19,057/- to the OP on 18.02.2016. OP issued certificate bearing Nos. 605000125978 to 605000125981 to the complainant. The maturity date of the those certificates is 18.02.2019 and maturity value of the those certificates is Rs. 6,43,671/-. Complainant issued letter dated 28.01.2020 requesting the OP to refund the matured amount. Despite maturity, the OP did not refund the matured amount. Complainant further alleges that there is gross deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the OP.
In view of the gross deficiency in service and unfair trade practices of the OP, complainant has filed the instant consumer complaint seeking payment of matured amount along with compensation and litigation cost.
Despite service of notice, the OP did not turn up to contest the case by filing WV. Thus, the case runs ex parte against the OP.
Complainant has filed her evidence supporting the allegations made in the complaint petition. Complainant has also filed various documents in support of his case. Despite several opportunities, OP did not file their WV.
We have considered the argument of the Ld. Advocate for the complainant and examined the record.
It is not in dispute that the complainant invested Rs. 4,19,057/- to the OP against certificate bearing Nos. 605000125978 to 605000125981 dated 18.02.2016. The maturity date of the said certificates is 18.02.2019. Despite several request and letter dated 28.01.2020, OP did not pay the matured amount to the complainant. OP is fully aware that they are liable to pay the matured amount to the complainant on its maturity. Complainant invested her hard earned money with the OP. The OP is deliberate to make illegal gains and to deprive the complainant from his lawful right. In fact, the OP withhold the maturity amount which no doubt deceitful manner of trade.
OP has not filed their WV denying the allegations made in the complaint petition. Complainant in her affidavit did support the allegations made out in the complaint. Therefore, it cannot be said that complainant has failed to prove deficiency in service and unfair trade practice of the OP. The act of the OP is a clear case of deception, which resulted in the injury and loss of opportunity to the complainant. Had the complainant not invested his money to the OP, she would have invested the same elsewhere. Complainant cannot be wait indefinitely to get the matured amount. Complainant has suffered mental agony and harassment. It is settled principal of law that the compensation should be commensurate with loss of suffered and it should be just, fair and reasonable and not arbitrary. In these circumstances, the complainant is entitled to get the maturity amount of Rs. Rs. 6,43,671/- from the OP along with compensation and litigation cost.
Based on the discussion above, the Consumer Case is allowed in part ex parte against the OP with the following directions :-
- OP is directed to pay matured amount of Rs. 6,43,671/- (Rupees six lacs fourty three thousand six hundred seventy one) only to the complainant.
- OP is further directed to pay Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only as compensation to the complainant on account of mental agony and physical harassment.
- OP is also directed to pay Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only towards litigation cost to the complainant.
The above directions be complied by the OP within a period of 90 days from today. For failure or omission in compliance within the stipulated period, the complainant shall be at liberty to put the order in execution as per CP Act.
Copy of the judgment be supplied to the parties as per rules. Upload the judgment on the website of this Commission for perusal of the parties.
