C.C. No.335/2022
Sri Biren Kumar Sahoo,
S/o. Sri Dharmananda Sahoo,
At- S/C-15, Market Complex,
V.S.S. Nagar, Bhubaneswar,
Dist.- Khurda,
At Present- At/P.O.- Ichhapur,
P.S.- Balikuda,
Dist.- Jagatsinghpur.……… Complainant
- The Manager, Hinduja Leyland Finance,
7VW5 + 97W Block-A, Sector- A,
Mancheswar Industrial Estate,
Rasulgarh, Bhubaneswar- 751007.
- The Manager, Corporate Office,
Hinduja Leyland Finance,
HIG.46, BDA, 01, 02,
Jayadev Vihar Road,
Opposite Palheight, BDA Colony,
Doordarshan colony, Gajapati Nagar,
Bhubaneswar, Dist.- Khurda- 751013.
- The Manager, Hinduja Leyland Finance,
Corporate Office #1 Sardar Patel Road,
-
Guindy, Chennai- 600032. …..… Opposite parties
For Complainant………..Mr. C. Mishra & Associates
For Opposite Parties………..Mr. M.C. Swain, Advocate
Date of Hearing: 16.5.2024 Date of Judgment: 24.5.2024 |
ORDER BY HON’BLE PRESIDENT- MR. P.K. PADHI:
JUDGMENT
Complainant, the owner of the multiple vehicles has filed the present consumer complaint and C.C. No.336/2022 before this Commission. The counsel for the complainant submitted that owner of 2(two) vehicle is a consumer as defined U/s.2 (7) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019. On the other hand the counsel for opposite parties relied on the decision of the Hon’ble National Commission in the case of Sri Jasobant Nrayan Ram Vrs. The B.M., L&T Finance, wherein Hon’ble National Commission appellant (consumer) has not been able to show as to how purchase of 2(two) trucks does not fall within the meaning of commercial transaction. Even in that case the plea of the complainant was that another truck was lying ideal, which was not accepted by Hon’ble National Commission, but in the present case, the complainant has filed 2(two) cases for 2(two) vehicle as such we find no merit in the consumer complaint and complainant being owner of the multiple vehicles is not a consumer as such the consumer complaint is dismissed. No cost.
Pronounced in the open Commission on this 24th May,2024.
