Orissa

Jagatsinghapur

CC/214/2022

Sumanta Das - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager HDB Financial Service . - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.S.Satapathy

14 Nov 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION JAGATSINGHPUR
JAGATSINGHPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/214/2022
( Date of Filing : 10 Aug 2022 )
 
1. Sumanta Das
Vill-Bikipur Po-Dasarapada Ps-Tirtol
Jagatsinghpur
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Manager HDB Financial Service .
Bhubaneswar
Khurda
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr.S.Satapathy, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 14 Nov 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Date of Filing: 10.08.2022

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: JAGATSINGHPUR

Present:

                        1. Mr. P. K. Padhi      ………………..        President

                        2. Mrs. M. Swain       ……………….        Member

 

                                            C.C. No.214/2022

 

Sumanta Das,

S/o. Gouranga Das,

Vill.- Bikipur,

P.O.- Dagarapada,

P.S.- Tirtol,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur.………Complainant​

Manager,

H.D.B. Financial Service,

Bhubaneswar,

Dist.- Khurda.                                                           …..… Opposite party                 

 

For Complainant………..Mr. S. Satapathy & Associates

Opposite Party……….Ex-parte

 

Date of Hearing: 24.10.2024                   Date of Judgment: 14.11.2024

ORDER BY HON’BLE MEMBER- MRS. M. SWAIN:

                                                                                                JUDGMENT

            Complainant has filed the consumer complaint U/s.35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 seeking to realize the arrear EMI in easy installments.

            Complainant took loan in 2020 to repay in 33 monthly EMI. Complainant failed to pay and violated the agreement for which proceeding U/s.138 of NI Act. has been initiated and on apprehension of repossession complainant has filed the consumer complaint seeking aforesaid relief. Relationship between complainant and opposite parties is that of Debtor and Creditor and complainant is liable to repay the loan as per the agreement/contract, for which we find no merit in the consumer complaint and any deficiency on the part of opposite parties. Besides that complainant is a defaulter of loan as per agreement.

            Bank/financer is not at all to be bothered about any internal insight of complainant with his partner/tenant/friend who cheated him. Complainant has taken loan and he has to pay back the same with interest as per agreement and the period of agreement has already expired. So we find no merit in the consumer complaint and accordingly the consumer complaint is dismissed. No cost.                                                                                       

            Pronounced in the open Commission on this 14th Nov.,2024.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.