West Bengal

Howrah

CC/14/3

SRI PARTHA SARATHI BOSE - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager, Essrbee Packers & Movers - Opp.Party(s)

18 Sep 2014

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 711 101.
(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/14/3
 
1. SRI PARTHA SARATHI BOSE
S/O Sri Pranab Kr. Bose, 34/4, Sastri Narendra Nath Ganguly Road, P.O. Santragachi, P.S. Shibpur
Howrah 711 104
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Manager, Essrbee Packers & Movers
Unit of Essrbee Roadies, 60, Lenin Sarani, 1st floor, Kolkata
Kolkata 700 013
2. Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Limited
Division XX, Unit no 101800, Jeevan Sudha Building 6th floor, 42/C, J. L. Nehru Road, Kolkata
Kolkata 700 071
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

DATE OF FILING                    :     07-01-2014..

DATE OF S/R                            :      06-03-2014.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER      :     18-09-2014.

 

Sri Partha Sarathi Bose,

son of Sri Pranab Kr. Bose,

residing at 34/4, Sastri Narendra Nath  Ganguly  Road,

P.O. Santragachi, P.S. Shibpur,

District – Howrah,

PIN – 711104. ------------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINANT.

 

-          Versus   -

 

1.      Manager,

ESSRBEE Packers & Movers,

Unit of Essrbee Roadies,

having its registered office

at 60, Lanin Sarani ( 1st floor ),

Kolkata – 700013.

 

2.      Divisional Manager,

National Insurance Company Limited,

Division XX, Unit No. 1001800, Jeevan Sudha Building ( 6th floor ),

42/C, J.L. Nehru Road,

Kolkata – 700071. --------------------------------------OPPOSITE PARTIES.

 

 

                                                P    R    E     S    E    N     T

 

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member      :      Shri P.K. Chatterjee.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

                         

                                                 F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

 

 

1.               The instant case was filed by complainant U/S 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986 wherein the complainant has  prayed for direction upon the o.p. no. 1 to make payment of damage charges to the tune of Rs. 1,25,374/- and compensation for Rs. 30,000/- and further direction  upon the o.p. no. 2 to make payment of Rs. 75,000/- covered under the insurance policy no. 101800/21/13/4500000308 dated 13-09-2013 for damaging the household articles during transits from New Delhi to Howrah.

 

2.               The o.p. no. 1 in his  written version contended interalia that this Court has no jurisdiction to try this complaint; that this is a harassing complaint and should be rejected.  

 

 

 

3.               The o.p. no. 2 in his  written version contended interalia that the instant petition of complaint is thoroughly misconceived; that most of articles during transit was in unpacked condition. So the complaint should be dismissed.

 

 

3.        Upon pleadings of  parties three points arose for determination :

 

i)         Whether this Forum has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint ?

ii)         Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.  ?

ii)                  Whether the complainant is  entitled to get any relief as prayed for ? 

 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

 

POINT NO. 1

 

 

4.               Much have been argued for lack of jurisdiction of this Forum to entertain the complaint.  The o.p. no. 1 took the articles from New Delhi residence of the complainant and delivered the same at his Howrah address. So the part cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the Forum. Section 11 ( C )  of the C.P. Act, 1986 comes into operation. Accordingly the dispute over jurisdiction is set at rest.  The point is accordingly disposed of. 

 

POINT NOS. 2 & 3

 

5.       Both the points are  taken up together for consideration. The attempt of the o.p.

no. 2 to shift the responsibility of the damage upon o.p. no. 1 amply proves the allegations of damage of the household belongings levelled by the complainant. 

 

6.      Admittedly the complainant entrusted the o.p. no. 1 for packing and moving his

household effects from New Delhi to Santragachi, Howrah, on 12-09-2013.  The o.p. no. 1 while receiving the charges also realized the charge of insurance from the complainant with assurance of    safe delivery. Naturally, the sole responsibility devolved upon the o.p. no. 1 for safe delivery. 

 

7.      Unfortunately good many articles were found damaged and broken when received

on 20-09-2013 ( para 10 of the petition of complaint ).  The value of the damaged articles though disputed by the o.p. no. 1, he cannot shift his responsibility as the complainant paid Rs. 22,400/- to the o.p. no. 1 inclusive of the insurance charge ( enclosures ).

 

8.      Likewise, the o.p. no. 2 also cannot repudiate the claim of the complainant and he

paid the insurance charge to the o.p. no. 1 as required.   

 

            We are, therefore, of the view that this is a fit case where the prayer of the complaint shall be allowed.

 

 

             Both the points are accordingly disposed of.            

 

      Hence,

                       

O     R     D      E      R      E        D

           

 

      That the C. C. Case No. 3 of 2014 ( HDF 3 of 2014 )  be and the same is   allowed on contest with  costs  as  against  the O.Ps. 

 

      The O.P. no. 1  be directed to pay Rs. 50,000/- as compensation to the complainant for causing damage to the household items.

     

      The o.p. no. 1 do further  pay a sum of Rs. 40,000/- to the complainant  for causing mental pain and unnecessary  harassment and Rs. 10,000/- as litigation costs.  

 

      The complainant no. 2 be directed  to pay  Rs. 35,000/- out of total covered insured amount of  Rs. 75,000/- to  the complainant for part damage of house-hold articles.

 

      Both the  o.ps. be directed to make payment as directed within 30 days from the date of this order failing the amount shall carry interest @ Rs. 12% per annum till full satisfaction. 

 

      The complainant is at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

       

      Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.

 

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.  

 

 

                                                                   

  (    T.K. Bhattacharya  )                                              

  President,  C.D.R.F., Howrah.

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.