Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/488/2012

BHASKARAN THAROLKANDI - Complainant(s)

Versus

MANAGER, DHANAKODI CHIT FUND - Opp.Party(s)

29 Apr 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/488/2012
 
1. BHASKARAN THAROLKANDI
POONATH.P.O NADUVANNUR (via) 673618
KOZHIKODE
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MANAGER, DHANAKODI CHIT FUND
BALUSSERY BRANCH KOZHIKODE-673612
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB., PRESIDENT
 HONOURABLE MR. L Jyothikumar, LLB., Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOZHIKODE.
C.C.488/2012
Dated this the 29th day of April 2013.
 
            ( Present: Sri. G. Yadunadhan, B.A., LLB.                              : President)                       
                             Sri. L. Jyothikumar, B.A., LLB.                                 : Member
 
 
ORDER
By G.Yadunadhan, President:
 
            The petition was filed on12.11.2012. The case of the complainant is that complainant was a subscriber of a chitty of five lakhs, each chitty having a sala of 1 lakh. Against of the opposite party misleaded the complainant that Chitty is for 5 lakhs. First instalmet of the chitty  is Rs.12,500/- Opposite party offered at the time of joining the chitty that 5th instalment the chitty would be disbursed after a deduction of 30%, means complainant is eligible to get Rs.3,50,000/-. Unfortunately complainant received only Rs.70,000/-. Now the opposite party violated the offer made by them. The act of the opposite party is clear deficiency of service. Therefore complainant is seeking relief against opposite party.
 
            Opposite party after serving notice not appeared or filed their version.
Points for consideration.
 
1)      Whether the  complaint is maintainable?
2)       Whether any deficiency of service on the part of opposite party.
 
Complainant  was continuously absent for the last 3 consecutive postings. On perusal of documents and the complaint itself not speaking the entire truth, complainant is failed to appear before this forum. Therefore on complainant itself no merit in this case. Therefore complaint is liable to be dismissed.
 
Pronounced in the open court this the 29th day of April 2013
Date of filing:12.11.2012.
 
SD/-PRESIDENT                                        SD/-MEMBER
 
//True copy//
(Forwarded/By Order)
 
 
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT
 
 
 
 
[HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONOURABLE MR. L Jyothikumar, LLB.,]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.