Shivlingappa Kange filed a consumer case on 19 Aug 2017 against Manager DCC Bank Ltd. Bidar in the Bidar Consumer Court. The case no is CC/93/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 31 Aug 2017.
::BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, AT BIDAR::
C.C. No.93/2016
Date of filing: 02.11.2016
Date of disposal: 19 .08.2017
P R E S E N T:-
(1) Shri. Jagannath Prasad Udgata, B.A., LL.B.,
President
(2) Shri. Shankrappa (Halipurgi),
B.A.LL.B.,
Member.
COMPLAINANT/S: ShivalingappaKange,
Age :75 years, Occ:President,
Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Bhavan Construction
Committee, Naubad, Bidar
(By Sri. P.M.Deshpande, Adv.)
VERSUS
OPPONENT/S: The Manager,
D.C.C Bank Limited,
Head Office, Near BasaveshwarChowk,
Hyderabad Road,
Bidar-585401.
(By Sri. Sanjaykumar S.Patil, Adv.)
:: J UD G M E N T ::
By Shri. Jagannath Prasad Udgata, President.
The complainant is working as President for Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Bhavan, since long period till this date. During the year 1989-90 and 1990-91, the complainant has deposited as F.D. amount with O.P bank as detailed below;
Sl.no. | FD A/c. No. | Date | FD amount | As on today 12% interest | Total Amount as on today |
1. | 9930 | 14.09.1989 | 10,000.00 | 32,400.00 | 42,400.00 |
2. | 10503 | 17.04.1990 | 42,688.50 | 1,60,080.00 | 1,78,768.00 |
3. | 10519 | 22.09.1990 | 7,800.00 | 24,336.00 | 32,142.00 |
4. | 10656 | 08.06.1991 | 16,500.00 | 51,840.00 | 68,340.00 |
5. | 18115 | 12.08.1991 | 6,700.00 | 19,904.00 | 26,604.00 |
6. | 18117 | 20.08.1991 | 8,000.00 | 24,960.00 | 32,960.00 |
|
|
|
| Total | 3,81,214.00 |
The above F.D. amount deposited was agreed rate of interest @ 12% per annum, and in total as on today, the amount comes to Rs.3,81,214/-. The complainant has several times visited the O.P bank for getting back the F.D amount with interest on various time, but each and every time, the O.P has shown various vague reasons and asked legal documents and other supporting papers etc. The complainant has produced all the relevant documentary evidences apart from the original certificate issued by the O.P bank with seal and signature of the O.P officials, thus it proves the admission of positivity of deposited amount, endorsed dated 23.8.1991. Thereafter for various occasions, the O.P and complainant was in continuous correspondences and even the complainant issued legal notice, but no proper response from the O.P. The complainant having rightful claimant for claiming F.D. amount etc., and at the last, the complainant demanded F.D. amount in the month of July-2016, which is not properly answered by O.P, which shows unfair, deficient service. Apart from the above, the complainant has suffered heavy and irreparable loss as the amount was required to develop the Bhavan under the committee aim and objects. The complainant being ‘consumer’ ‘depositor’ to the O.P bank ‘service provider’, so it is a ‘consumer dispute’, for which the O.P has to provide the proper services to its consumers. Hence, the complaint for claiming F.D. amount etc.
6. Considering contention of the complaint, the following points arise for our consideration:-
7. Our answers to the points stated above are as follows:-
:: REASONS ::
8. Point No.1 :- True to the assertions of the O.P. in the versions, another outfit claiming themselves to be the real office bearers of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Bhavan construction committee, headed by one Sri Revanappa and Sri. Gopal Rao Lade has raised a dispute before the bank regarding the entitlements of the present complainant to withdraw the F.D. Amount. In fact, the said gentlemen have approached this forum against the same O.P. by filing C.C.No. 13/2017. There in, the complainants claim to be in possession of the original F.D. receipts and claim the usufruct of the deposits.
9. A submission was made at the Bar that, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Bhavan construction committee was an unregistered organisation, who had collected contributions from public to construct such a Bhavan for public use. No individual or individuals can claim the public money and only the duly elected representatives of the committee can have any rightful claim over the same. Miserably both sides have failed to prove their case even before this Forum. The O.P. bank also had not received documents as per the asking satisfactorily and hence, there is no deficiency of service evident.
10. Even otherwise both the feuding groups are rather trying to get a declaratory relief from this Forum for which we are not legally empowered. Therefore answering point No.1 in the negative, we proceed to pass the following:
::ORDER::
(Typed to our dictation then corrected, signed by us and then pronounced in the open Forum on this 19th day of August-2017).
Sri. Shankrappa H. Sri. Jagannath Prasad
Member. President.
Documents produced by the complainant
Bidar town Circle.
Document produced by the Opponent.
–NIL-
Sri. Shankrappa H. Sri. Jagannath Prasad
Member. President.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.