West Bengal

StateCommission

A/433/2018

Sri Santanu Datta - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager, Canara Bank & Ors. - Opp.Party(s)

In-person

24 Sep 2019

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. A/433/2018
( Date of Filing : 03 May 2018 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/04/2018 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/349/2017 of District Kolkata-I(North))
 
1. Sri Santanu Datta
118A, Madan Mohan Burman Street, Kolkata - 700 007.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Manager, Canara Bank & Ors.
College Street Br., 6A, Sambhu Chatterjee Street, P.S. - Jorasanko, Kolkata - 700 073.
2. Manager, Canara Bank
Gariahat Br., 22/2, Gariahat Road, Golpark, P.S. Gariahat, Kolkata - 700 029.
3. Sri T. N. Manoharan, Chairman, Canara Bank
Head office- 112, J.C. Road, Bangalore - 560 002, Karnataka.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:In-person, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Aparajita Ghosh., Advocate
Dated : 24 Sep 2019
Final Order / Judgement

Sri Shyamal Gupta, Member

Challenge under this Appeal is the Order dated 02-04-2018, passed by the Ld. District Forum, Kolkata-I (North) in CC/349/2017.  Incidentally, by such order, the complaint case was allowed, albeit in part.

Aggrieved with the inaction on the part of the Respondent Bank to refund the amount of Rs. 5,522/- that was incorrectly debited from the account of the Appellant towards locker rent, the instant complaint case was filed.  Notwithstanding the said case was allowed, as the compensation awarded did not satisfy the Appellant vis-à-vis the harassment faced by him, he moved this Appeal.

Undisputedly, the Appellant did not avail of locker facility from the Respondent Bank.  Admittedly, the disputed amount was deducted by mistake by the Respondent Bank. 

It appears that the disputed amount was deducted from the account of the Appellant on 27-07-2017.  Allegedly, due to such goof up on the part of the Respondent Bank, the Appellant could not make a Fixed Deposit of Rs. 93,000/-.

As it further appears, the Appellant vigorously chased the matter with all concerned officials, but till the date of filing of the complaint case, there was no positive development.  Only after the complaint case was filed, the charge debited earlier was reversed. 

Though the Respondent bank attributed the delay to technical hindrance and official procedure, let me empathically make it clear that it is not the concern of a hapless customer.  As the wrong was done by the Respondent Bank, it was incumbent on its part to swing into action expeditiously and effectively to undo the wrong.  It is hardly believable that despite the best intentions on its part, the Respondent could not sort out such trifle matter in 5 months. There was definite laches on the part of the Respondent Bank.

It is also unfortunate that, the Respondent Bank did not pay any interest for the intervening period between 27-07-2017 and 28-12-2017.

Considering all aspects, I am inclined to enhance the compensation amount to Rs. 5,000/- from Rs. 1,000/-, as awarded by the Ld. District Forum and accordingly, direct the Respondent No. 2 to credit the differential amount to the savings account of the Appellant within a period of 40 days from this day, i.d., simple interest @ 9% p.a. shall be payable on the sum of Rs. 4,000/- for the entire period of default.

The Appeal, thus, stands allowed in part.  

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.