Haryana

Karnal

CC/373/2019

Amir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Manager Canara Bank - Opp.Party(s)

S.S. Sivia

21 Apr 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No.373 of 2019

                                                          Date of instt. 28.06.2019

                                                          Date of Decision: 21.04.2022

 

Amir Singh son of Shri Maan Singh, resident of village Behlolpur block, District Karnal.

                                                                        …….Complainant

                                        Versus

 

1.     Manager Canara Bank Kachhwa, District Karnal.

2.     Manager, SBI General Insurance Co. SCO no.388-389, 1^st floor, B.D. International, Karan Commercial Complex, Old Mugal Canal, Karnal.

                                                                        …..Opposite parties.

 

Complaint under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as amended under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before      Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member

                Dr.Rekha Chaudhary…Member

 

Present:  None for complainant.

                Shri Manoj Kumar Sachdeva, counsel for OP no.1

                Shri Virender Sharma, counsel for OP no.2.

                Shri Surender Kumar, Project Officer of OP no.3.

 

                Today the case was fixed for evidence of complainant subject to last opportunity. Neither anyone has appeared on behalf of complainant nor any evidence on behalf of complainant has been produced.A careful perusal of the file, it reveals that since 28.01.2020, the case was adjourned for evidence of complainant. From January, 2020 till today, complainant has failed to conclude his evidence after availing several opportunities including seven last opportunities. It seems that complainant is no more interested to pursue his case. There is no justification to adjourn the case further as it pertains to the year 2019.

        Hence, in view the above discussion, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated: 21.04.2022

                                                                                                    President, 

District Consumer Disputes                               

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

 

 

    (Vineet Kaushik)      (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)

                         Member                    Member