West Bengal

Hooghly

CC/37/2023

AMIT KUMAR CHATTERJEE - Complainant(s)

Versus

MALLIKA ROY - Opp.Party(s)

KISHORE KUMAR GUPTA

20 Mar 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HOOGHLY
CC OF 2021
PETITIONER
VERS
OPPOSITE PARTY
 
Complaint Case No. CC/37/2023
( Date of Filing : 27 Feb 2023 )
 
1. AMIT KUMAR CHATTERJEE
DANKUNI HOUSING ESTATE, DANKUNI, P.S- DANKUNI, DIST- HOOGHLY, PIN- 712311
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MALLIKA ROY
22 R.N TAGORE RD, BEDIAPARA, KOLKATA 700077
KOLKATA
WEST BENGAL
2. SRI TAMAL MUKHERJEE
THE SECRETARY , DANKUNI, LIG, PHASE 1, BLOCK D, CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD., P.O AND P.S- DANKUNI, DIST- HOOGHLY, PIN- 712311
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Minakshi Chakraborty MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Debasis Bhattacharya MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 20 Mar 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Order no.  3, dt. 20.03.2023

Today is fixed for further admission hearing.

Ld. Advocate for the complainant is present.

Heard and considered submission.

Perused the complaint petition and the documents annexed along with the complaint petition.

On close examination of the materials of this case record it appears that the complainant is claiming title in respect of the schedule mentioned property by filing this case but facts remain that this District Commission is not the proper Forum for vesting title to the complainant. Moreso, this case has been filed in respect of a flat of Dankuni Phase I, LIG Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. but fact remains that the complainant has neither impleaded West Bengal Housing Board nor Dankuni Phase I, LIG Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. as a party of this case and so this case is bad for defect of parties. Moreover, in this case the complainant has sought for the relief which is coming under the purview of Specific Relief Act. So, Civil Court is the proper jurisdiction for filing this case.

Considering all the above noted factors this District Commission is of the view that this complaint case is not maintainable and this District Commission has no jurisdiction to try this case.

In the result, it is accordingly,

Ordered

that this complaint case no. 37 of 2023 be and the same is dismissed.

No order is passed as to costs.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasish Bandyopadhyay]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Minakshi Chakraborty]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasis Bhattacharya]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.