NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4435/2009

AJMER VIDYUT VITERAN NIGAM LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MALIRAM - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SHYAM MOORJANI

19 Jan 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 02 Dec 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4435/2009
(Against the Order dated 18/08/2006 in Appeal No. 600/1998 of the State Commission Rajasthan)
1. AJMER VIDYUT VITERAN NIGAM LTD.Through Executive Engineer, AVVNL, Khetri,Jhunjhunu,Rajasthan.2. CHIEF ENGINEER, AVVNL, JHUNJHUNUThrough Executive Engineer, AVVNL, Khetri,Jhunjhunu,Rajasthan.3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AVVNL, CHIDAVAThrough Executive Engineer, AVVNL, Khetri,Jhunjhunu,Rajasthan.4. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, AVVNL, KHETRI.Through Executive Engineer, AVVNL, Khetri,Jhunujhunu,Rajasthan. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. MALIRAMR/o Mharam Gujarvas Tehsil-Khotri, Jhunjhunu(Rajasthan) ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 19 Jan 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          This revision petition has been filed with a delay of 1094 days which is over and above the statutory period of 90 days given for filing the revision petition.  Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 the consumer fora are required to decide the case in a summary manner within 90 days of its filing where no evidence is required to be


-2-

taken and within 150 days where the evidence is required to be taken.  In the present case, the inordinate delay of 1094 days over and above the statutory period given for filing the revision petition, cannot be condoned without showing sufficient cause.  The only reason given for condonation of delay in the application is that the file was misplaced or was moving from table to table.  We are not  satisfied  with the cause shown.  Application for condonation of delay is dismissed.  Consequently, revision petition is dismissed as barred by time.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER