Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/12/182

Sachidananda Rai - Complainant(s)

Versus

Malabar Regional Co-op. Milk Producers Union Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

K.m.Ballakuraya, Kasaragod

15 Jun 2012

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/182
 
1. Sachidananda Rai
S/o.Kallikge Veedu. Paivalige.Po.
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Malabar Regional Co-op. Milk Producers Union Ltd
Kasaragod Dairy, Anandasram, Kanhangad.
Kasaragod
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE P.Ramadevi Member
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

                                                                            Date of filing   :  29-05-2012 

                                                                            Date of order  :   13-06-2012

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                                CC.182/2012

                         Dated this, the  13th    day of   June    2012

PRESENT

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ                                             : PRESIDENT

SMT.P.RAMADEVI                                      : MEMBER

SMT. K.G.BEENA                                        : MEMBER

 

Sachidananda Rai, S/o. Kallikge Veedu House,    } Complainant

Paivalike village and Po. Kasaragod Taluk.

(Adv. K.M. Ballakuraya, Kasaragod)

 

Malabar Regional Co-operative Milk Producers     } Opposite party

Union Ltd, Kasaragod Dairy, Anandashramam,

Kanhangad.Po. Hosdurg Taluk.

 

                                                                        O R D E R

SMT.P.RMADEVI, MEMBER

 

            The facts of the complaint is that the complainant is transporting the milk for opposite party as per a transport contract basis. Subsequently the route as per contract was extended and he is not getting any extra payment for the extended route.  Hence this complaint is filed against the opposite party alleging unfair trade practice.

2.         Here the preliminary question is whether the complainant is a consumer or whether this complaint is maintainable before the Forum.

3.         Upon hearing of the complainant it is clear that the complainant is doing transportation Job under opposite party on a contract basis.  Hence he is not a consumer as per the Consumer Protection Act.  Therefore this complaint is not maintainable before this Forum.

            Hence the complaint is dismissed as not maintainable.

 

MEMBER                               MEMBER                                                       PRESIDENT

Pj/

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE P.Ramadevi]
Member
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.