Delhi

West Delhi

CC/16/751

LALITA SHARMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA - Opp.Party(s)

22 Feb 2017

ORDER

                                         D.O.O.- 22/02/2017

Present :-          None for complainant.

Complaint passed over several times since morning. It is already 02.30 P.M. But none put in appearance on behalf of complainant. A photocopy of settlement dated 20.02.2017 placed on record by representative of opposite party. Which shows that grievance of complainant is redressed. No further wait is justified and possible. It seems that Complainant is not interested in prosecution of Complaint.

Therefore, this forum has no option except to dismiss the Complaint in default for non-prosecution. Hence the Complaint is dismissed in default for non prosecution.

Copy of order be sent to the parties as per rules. File be consigned.   

 

 

(PUNEET LAMBA)                                      (URMILA GUPTA)                                     ( R.S.  BAGRI )

     MEMBER                                                     MEMBER                                                    PRESIDENT

    22/02/2017                                                              22/02/2017                                                22/02/2017

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.