Kerala

Kottayam

CC/42/2018

Smitha Baiju - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

08 Oct 2021

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/42/2018
( Date of Filing : 07 Mar 2018 )
 
1. Smitha Baiju
Kunnel Puthuparambil Ethithanam P.O
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
Gateway Building Appolo Bunder Mumbai
Maharastra
2. TVS Sundharam Ayyankar& Sons
Sundharam Ayyankar & Sons,Kottayam.Pin:686013
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 08 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 08th day of October, 2021

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Smt.  Bindhu R,  Member

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No. 42/2018 (filed on 08/03/2018)

 

Petitioner                                          :         Smitha Baiju,

                                                                   Kunnel Puthuparambil,

                                                                   Ithithanam P.O.

                                                                   Pin – 686 535.

                                                                   (Adv. Jobin Mathew )

                                                                             Vs.                            

Opposite parties                               :    1) Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.

                                                                   Gateway Building,

                                                                   Appolo Bunder, Mumbai.

                                                              (Adv. Saji Mathew, Adv. Denu Joseph,

                                                               Adv. Neethu Reghukumar and

     Adv. Sophy Punnoos)

 

                                                              2)   T.V. Sundram Iyengar and Sons,

                                                                   Kottayam – 686013.

                                                                   (Adv. Sony Sebastian)

 

O  R  D  E  R

 

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

          Complainant represented.  Counsel for the complainant submitted that they are not pressing the complaint.  A not pressed memo is also filed by the counsel for the complainant.  Hence the complaint is disposed as not pressed.

        Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 08th day of October, 2021.

Sri. Manulal V.S. President             Sd/-

Smt.  Bindhu R,  Member               Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                 Sd/-

                                                                             By Order

j/4cs                                                                      Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.