Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/97/2015

G. Karthikeyan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., Rep by its Managing Director & 2 Ors. - Opp.Party(s)

Complt.-In person,

25 Oct 2021

ORDER

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                              BEFORE   HON’BLE THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                  Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                               ::      MEMBER

 

CC. No. 97/2015

                                                               DATED THIS THE 25^th  DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

 

Shri.Karthikeyan.G,

F1, Star Foundation,

4/2, Madurai Swamy Madam street,

Sembium, Perambur,

Chennai – 600 011                                                ..complainant /party in person

 

                                              Vs

 

1. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd,

Rep.by its Managing Director,

Head office, Automotive Sector,

Mahindra Towers – 3^rd Floor,

Akurli Road, Kandivali (East),

Mumbai – 400 101  

 

2. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd,

Rep.by its Regional Manager, Regional office,

No.17/18,  Mahindra Towers 1^st floor,

Pattuloas Road, Mount Road,

Chennai - 600 002.

 

3. Zulaikha Motors Pvt. Ltd,

Rep.by its Managing Director,

(Authorised Dealer for Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd)

No.398 & 398-A,

Velachery Tambaram Main Road,

Opp. to Railway Station,

Velachery, Chennai – 600 042                                               ..opposite parties

 

For complainant                                                    : M/s A.Gokulakrishnan

Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2                 : M/s Shivakumar & Suresh

Counsel for 3^rd opposite party                           : M/s T.V.Lakshmanan

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :                                                           

                                       

                                                   Docket order

 

              No representation for Complainant. Opposite parties 1 to 3 present.   Today this matter is posted for filing proof affidavit of complainant and for appropriate orders. When this matter was called at 11.00 a.m, there was no representation for complainant, hence the matter was passed over and again called at 12.45 noon, the complainant was again not present. Proof affidavit also not filed. Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.

 

         Sd/-                                                                                                               Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                             PRESIDENT