Madhya Pradesh

StateCommission

CC/20/37

AJAY PRATAP SINGH SIKARWAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

SH.S.S.PARVEZ

24 Sep 2020

ORDER

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL

 

                          CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 37 OF 2020

AJAY PRATAP SINGH SIKARWAR & ORS. VS MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD. & ORS

O R D E R    S H E E T

 

DATE OF ORDER

 ORDER WITH SIGNATURE

ORDER OF THE REGISTRAR ON OFFICE NOTING

 

24.09.2020

            THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING

                   Shri Sayed Shahid Parvez, learned counsel for the complainant.

                   Heard learned counsel for the complainant.

                   Having regard to the fact that the complainant has paid Rs.26,50,000/- as consideration towards cost of the vehicle, the complaint will fall within the pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the complaint.

                   The complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file the same before the appropriate District Commission in accordance with law. Court fees deposited by the complainant be refunded to the complainant.  

 

(Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar)      (S. S. Bansal)

             President                              Member

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.