Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/17/73

V Rajagopal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mahesh R J - Opp.Party(s)

22 Mar 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      : PRESIDENT

                           SMT.PREETHA.G.NAIR    : MEMBER

                           SRI.VIJU.V.R                    : MEMBER

 

CC.NO.73/17 (Filed on : 15.02.2017)

ORDER DATED :22.03.2022

COMPLAINANT

          V.Rajagopalan,

          S/o.Vasudevan Unni,

          Residing at Orikkattu Sree Madom,

          Kanaka Nagar , A – 173,

          Kowdiar.P.O, Thiruvananthapuram

 

                              (By Adv.K.Ramesan)

 

VS

OPPOSITE PARTY

Mahesh.R.G

Branch in Charge Forex Wall Street Finance Ltd,

Shop No.108, Attukal Shopping Complex,

Fort, Thiruvananthapuram

 

(By Sasthamangalam Adv.Ajithkumar)

 

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      : PRESIDENT

This complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2.         This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service in respect of amount due from the opposite party in connection with exchange money transfer in Canadian dollars. The opposite party filed version denying the allegation of deficiency in service. The complainant filed chief affidavit on 25.09.2017. Since 02.08.2018 the complainant is continuously absent. In order to substantiate the case put forward by the complainant against the opposite party, the complainant has not marked any documents in spite of giving sufficient opportunities to the complainant. As the complainant has failed to utilize those opportunities for adducing evidence to establish his case, we find that the complainant has miserably failed to establish his case. There is no material evidence before this Commission from the side of the complainant. In the above circumstances as the complainant failed to establish his case put forward against the opposite party, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed.

 

In the result, the complaint is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

 

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

        Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 22^{nd day} of March 2022.

                                                                             Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

                                                                                      Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                                                                                      Sd/-

                          VIJU.V.R        : MEMBER

 

Be/

 

 

 

 

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER

DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU

 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

CC.NO.73/17

ORDER DATED :22.03.2022